Ebrahiminia v. Mayorkas et al
| Pegah Ebrahiminia |
| Emilia M. Bardini, Andrew Davidson, Assistant Director Jennifer B. Higgins, Director Larry C Denayer, Christopher Wray and Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas |
| 3:2021cv01954 |
| March 19, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Jacqueline Scott Corley |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 14, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley granting #9 Stipulation To Extend Time Within Which Defendants Must File A Response. (ahm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/14/2021)
|
| Filing 9 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Stipulation To Extend Time Within Which Defendants Must File A Response and [Proposed] Order filed by Emilia M. Bardini, Andrew Davidson, Larry C Denayer, Jennifer B. Higgins, Alejandro Mayorkas, Christopher Wray. (Kurlan, Elizabeth) (Filed on 5/13/2021) |
| Filing 8 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Emilia M. Bardini, Andrew Davidson, Larry C Denayer, Jennifer B. Higgins, Alejandro Mayorkas, Christopher Wray.. (Kurlan, Elizabeth) (Filed on 5/13/2021) |
| Filing 7 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Pegah Ebrahiminia.. (Martin, Michael) (Filed on 4/16/2021) |
| Filing 6 CLERK'S NOTICE Re: Consent or Declination: Plaintiff shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge by 4/19/2021. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. (ahm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/5/2021) |
| Filing 5 Immigration Mandamus Case Procedural Order (elyS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/22/2021) |
| Filing 4 Civil Cover Sheet by Pegah Ebrahiminia UPDATED. (Martin, Michael) (Filed on 3/22/2021) |
| Filing 3 Civil Cover Sheet by Pegah Ebrahiminia . (Martin, Michael) (Filed on 3/22/2021) |
| #Electronic filing error. Case has been randomly assigned to judge, however incorrect Civil Cover Sheet CAND 44 (Rev. 06/17) used at case opening. Please complete and re-file as a separate docket entry correct Civil Cover Sheet JS-CAND 44 (Rev. 10/20 re: #1 . #1 Petition for Writ of Mandamus filed by Pegah Ebrahiminia (bwS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/22/2021) |
| Filing 2 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 4/2/2021. (bwS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/19/2021) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Mandamus (Filing fee $402 receipt number 0971-15727736). Filed byPegah Ebrahiminia. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Martin, Michael) (Filed on 3/19/2021) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
