KANG v. PayPal Holdings, Inc et al
| HUEI-TING KANG |
| PayPal Holdings, Inc, Daniel H. Schulman and John D. Rainey |
| 3:2021cv06468 |
| August 20, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Charles R Breyer |
| Securities/Commodities |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 27, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
STIPULATION AND ORDER ORDER CONTINUING DATE UPON WHICH RESPONSIVE PLEADING IS DUE by Judge Charles R. Breyer: Granting #11 Stipulation. (lsS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/24/2021)
|
| Filing 11 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER CONTINUING DATE UPON WHICH RESPONSIVE PLEADING IS DUE filed by PayPal Holdings, Inc, John D. Rainey, Daniel H. Schulman. (Talarides, Alexander) (Filed on 9/23/2021) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by James Neil Kramer for Defendants PayPal Holdings, Inc., Daniel H. Schulman, and John D. Rainey (Kramer, James) (Filed on 9/23/2021) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Alexander K. Talarides for Defendants PayPal Holdings, Inc., Daniel H. Schulman, and John D. Rainey (Talarides, Alexander) (Filed on 9/23/2021) |
| Filing 8 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by HUEI-TING KANG. Service waived by John D. Rainey waiver sent on 8/27/2021, answer due 10/26/2021. (Pafiti, Jennifer) (Filed on 9/23/2021) |
| Filing 7 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by HUEI-TING KANG. Service waived by Daniel H. Schulman waiver sent on 8/27/2021, answer due 10/26/2021. (Pafiti, Jennifer) (Filed on 9/23/2021) |
| Filing 6 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by HUEI-TING KANG. Service waived by PayPal Holdings, Inc waiver sent on 8/27/2021, answer due 10/26/2021. (Pafiti, Jennifer) (Filed on 9/23/2021) |
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to PayPal Holdings, Inc, John D. Rainey, Daniel H. Schulman. (hdjS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/23/2021) |
| Filing 4 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. Case Management Statement due by 11/12/2021. Initial Case Management Conference set for 11/19/2021 08:30 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom 06, 17th Floor. (hdjS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/23/2021) |
| Filing 3 Case assigned to Judge Charles R. Breyer. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. (asS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/20/2021) |
| Filing 2 Proposed Summons. (Pafiti, Jennifer) (Filed on 8/20/2021) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against PayPal Holdings, Inc, John D. Rainey, Daniel H. Schulman ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 0971-16306816.). Filed byHUEI-TING KANG. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Pafiti, Jennifer) (Filed on 8/20/2021) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
