Cases 1 - 10 of 21
NELSON v. SCHULMAN et al
as 3:2023cv01913
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN NELSON
Defendant:
DANIEL H. SCHULMAN, JOHN D. RAINEY, RODNEY C. ADKINS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Stockholders Suits
Shah v. Schulman et al
as 1:2022cv01445
Plaintiff:
Alpesh Shah
Defendant:
Daniel H. Schulman, John D. Rainey, Rodney C. Adkins and others
Nominal Defendant:
PayPal Holdings, Inc.
Rainey v. Soqui et al
as 4:2022cv02387
Plaintiff:
John D. Rainey
Defendant:
Javier Soqui, Curtis L. Jordan and Thanh Truc Thi Le
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lalor v. Schulman et al
as 3:2022cv00370
Plaintiff:
Robert Lalor
Defendant:
Daniel H. Schulman, John D. Rainey, Rodney C. Adkins and others
Pang v. PayPal Holdings, Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv09720
Plaintiff:
Shang Pang
Defendant:
PayPal Holdings, Inc., Daniel H Schulman, John D. Rainey and others
KANG v. PayPal Holdings, Inc et al
as 3:2021cv06468
Plaintiff:
HUEI-TING KANG
Defendant:
PayPal Holdings, Inc, Daniel H. Schulman and John D. Rainey
Dewbre et al v. Richardson et al
as 4:2020cv02661
Defendant:
Curtis L. Jordan, John M. Hasting, Jamarcus D. Goodall and others
Plaintiff:
Juan J. Omelas, Servando Duran, Roy Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dewbre et al v. Richardson et al
as 4:2020cv02634
Defendant:
Curtis L. Jordan, John M. Hasting, Jody L. Baker and others
Plaintiff:
Juan J. Omelas, Servando Duran, Roy Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Eckert, et al v. PayPal Holdings, Inc., et al
as 19-16869
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN KUNZE, TIO NETWORKS ULC, JOHN D. RAINEY, Jr. and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EDWIN K. BELL, Lead Plaintiffs and MICHAEL ECKERT
Sgarlata v. PayPal Holdings, Inc. et al
as 3:2017cv06956
Defendant:
John D. Rainey, Jr., Daniel H. Schulman, Hamed Shahbazi and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald Sgarlata, Edwin K. Bell and Michael Eckert
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
