Jones v. Perez-Pantoja et al
| Amos Jones |
| I. Perez-Pantoja and A. Turingan |
| 3:2022cv00773 |
| February 7, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| PSLC CHC |
| Thomas S Hixson |
| Prisoner: Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 9, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Thomas S. Hixson denying #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. (Attachments: #1 Envelope Mailing Service Label)(rmm2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/15/2022)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
|
| Filing 4 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Amos Jones. (sfb, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/28/2022) |
| Filing 3 Notice of Assignment of Prisoner Case to Magistrate Judge (sfb, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/10/2022)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Amos Jones. (sfb, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/7/2022) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against I. Perez-Pantoja, A. Turingan. Filed by Amos Jones. Consent/Declination due by 3/9/2022. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(sfb, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/7/2022) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
