Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Jones v. Pagliari
as 24-1614
Plaintiff: AMOS JONES
Defendant: RICHARD M. PAGLIARI, Attorney at Law
Amos Jones v. Pagliari
as 2:2024cv00847
Plaintiff: Amos Jones
Defendant: Richard M. Pagliari
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Perez-Pantoja et al
as 3:2022cv00773
Plaintiff: Amos Jones
Defendant: I. Perez-Pantoja and A. Turingan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00031
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1681
Jones v. Mora et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2020cv04093
Plaintiff: Amos Jones
Defendant: S. Mora, H, Madsen and H. Madsen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FORD v. JONES et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv01481
Defendant: LINDA TEABOUT, DEWANA SANG, AMOS JONES and others
Plaintiff: DELORES FORD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Christian Dior Couture, S.A. v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A"
as 1:2015cv10859
Plaintiff: Christian Dior Couture, S.A.
Defendant: The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", 2016BAGSHOESHOP.COM, 2016BAGSHOPS.COM and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Jones v. City of Akron et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2014cv02618
Defendant: City of Akron, Robert McFarland, Charles Park and others
Plaintiff: Dewey Amos Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Davenport et al v. City of Richmond, Virginia
as 3:2012cv00710
Plaintiff: Donald Davenport , Montague Agee , Michael Alston and others
Defendant: City of Richmond, Virginia
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Jones et al v. Intuitive Surgical, Inc.
as 7:2012cv01082
Plaintiff: Gwendolyn Jones and Amos Jones, Jr
Defendant: Intuitive Surgical, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?