Clark v. Goldstein et al
| Loureece Stone Clark |
| Mark H. Goldstein, James M. Kim, Robert T. Doyle and Shelly Marie Scott |
| 3:2022cv02962 |
| May 19, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Laurel Beeler |
| Jacqueline Scott Corley |
| PSLC JNE |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 5, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Loureece Stone Clark. (anj, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/6/2022) |
| Filing 8 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Loureece Stone Clark. (anj, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/29/2022) |
| Filing 7 CLERK'S NOTICE re completion of In Forma Pauperis affidavit or payment of filing fee due within 28 days. IFP Form due by 8/8/2022. (anj, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/29/2022)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) |
| Mailed notice #7 to plaintiff at Marin County Jail. 6/29/2022 (ljf, COURT STAFF). Modified on 6/29/2022 (ljf, COURT STAFF). |
Filing 6
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler no longer assigned to case, Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. Signed by Clerk on 06/21/2022. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(mbc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/21/2022)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
|
| Filing 5 CLERK'S NOTICE of Impending Reassignment to U.S. District Judge. (ejk, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/21/2022)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) |
| Corrected plaintiff's Marin County Jail address from 3501 Civic Center Drive to 13 Peter Behr Drive. (ljf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/21/2022). |
| Filing 4 Mail sent to Loureece Stone Clark returned as undeliverable ("incorrect address") re #3 Notice of Assignment of Prisoner Case to Magistrate Judge, #2 Clerk's Notice re: IFP,. Mail Returned; response required by 8/2/2022. (jml, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/3/2022) Modified on 6/21/2022 (ljf, COURT STAFF). |
| Filing 3 Notice of Assignment of Prisoner Case to Magistrate Judge. (anj, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/19/2022)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) |
| Filing 2 CLERK'S NOTICE re completion of In Forma Pauperis affidavit or payment of filing fee due within 28 days. IFP Form due by 6/27/2022. (anj, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/19/2022)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Robert T. Doyle, Mark H. Goldstein, James M. Kim, Shelly Marie Scott. Filed by Loureece Stone Clark. Consent/Declination due by 6/20/2022. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(anj, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/19/2022) |
| Clerks Notices mailed to Pro-Se party. (anj, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/19/2022) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
