Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Ashby v. Doyle et al
as 3:2023cv02968
Plaintiff:
Defonte Ashby
Defendant:
Robert T. Doyle, Roberto Walton and Beverly Woods
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Camacho v. Buccholz et al
as 3:2022cv07656
Plaintiff:
Jose Cesar Camacho
Defendant:
Peri Buccholz, Brenton Shcnieder, Robert T. Doyle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ashby v. Hale et al
as 3:2022cv07417
Petitioner:
Defonte T. Ashby
Respondent:
Robert T. Doyle
Defendant:
Hale
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Clark v. Goldstein et al
as 3:2022cv02962
Plaintiff:
Loureece Stone Clark
Defendant:
Mark H. Goldstein, James M. Kim, Robert T. Doyle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Stanislaus Funding, Inc. v. Gavin Newsom et al
as 2:2020cv04646
Defendant:
Janice Hahn, Federal Glover, Don Barnes and others
Plaintiff:
Stanislaus Funding, Inc. d/b/a Patioworld and Stanislaus Funding, Inc. a California corporation doing business as Patioworld
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gollub et al v. City of Sausalito et al
as 3:2018cv07386
Plaintiff:
Charlotte Grossman Gollub and James O.S. Gollub
Defendant:
Marin County, Matt Butler, John Rohrbacher and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Camacho v. Lombardo et al
as 2:2018cv02085
Respondent:
Joseph Michael Lombardo, Robert T. Doyle and Edward S. Berberian, Jr.
Petitioner:
Jose Cesar Camacho
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Camacho v. Lombardo et al
as 4:2018cv06504
Respondent:
Joseph Michael Lombardo, Robert T. Doyle and Edward S. Berberian, Jr.
Petitioner:
Jose Cesar Camacho
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00102
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Camacho v. Cruz et al
as 3:2017cv06652
Plaintiff:
Jose Cesar Camacho
Defendant:
Alfonso Ortiz Cruz, Buchholz, Schnider and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
