Moses v. District of Columbia et al
| David John Moses |
| District of Columbia, United States Corporation, Marin County Corporation, James M. Kim, Paul M. Haakenson, Lori Furgoli, San Rafael Police Department, John Doe #1, J. Carpenter, John Doe #2 and Leland |
| 3:2022cv05021 |
| September 2, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Jacqueline Scott Corley |
| PSLC JNE |
| Mandamus & Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 3, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by David John Moses. (kkp, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/15/2022) Modified on 9/16/2022 (kkp, COURT STAFF). |
| Filing 2 CLERK'S NOTICE re completion of In Forma Pauperis affidavit or payment of filing fee due within 28 days. IFP Form due by 10/11/2022. (jml, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/2/2022)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against J. Carpenter, District of Columbia, John Doe #1, John Doe #2, Lori Furgoli, Paul M. Haakenson, James M. Kim, Leland, Marin County Corporation, San Rafael Police Department, United States Corporation. Filed by David John Moses. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(jml, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/2/2022) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
