Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv05021
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bonilla v. Simmons et al
as 4:2022cv03449
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla
Defendant:
Judge Kelly V. Simmons, Judge Faye D. Opal, Paul M. Haakenson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00883
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bonilla v. Marin County et al
as 4:2022cv00271
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla
Defendant:
Marin County, Judge Kelly V. Simmons, Judge Faye D'Opal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bonilla v. San Francisco County et al
as 3:2020cv02989
Defendant:
Humboldt, Kelly V. Simmons, Marin County and others
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bonilla v. Simmons et al
as 3:2019cv01825
Defendant:
Kelly V. Simmons, Paul M. Haakenson and Faye D. Opal
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bonilla v. Alameda County et al
as 4:2018cv06434
Respondent:
Judge Joshua Weinstein, Judge Jeffrey W. Horner, San Francisco County and others
Petitioner:
Steven Wayne Bonilla
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Barrow v. People of the State of Calfornia et al
as 3:2014cv02572
Plaintiff:
Raekubian Alexander Barrow
Defendant:
People of the State of Calfornia, Linda Persons, Veronica Hicks Gladden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Theodore Shove v. M. Martel, et al
as 12-16148
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THEODORE C. SHOVE
Defendant - Appellee:
M. MARTEL, Warden, KAMALA D. HARRIS, Attorney General, PAUL M. HAAKENSON and others
Shove -v- Martel, et al
as 5:2011cv03707
Plaintiff:
Theodore Shove
Defendant:
M Martel, K. Harris, Paul M. Haakenson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
