Strojnik v. Starbucks Corporation
Plaintiff: Peter Strojnik
Defendant: Starbucks Corporation
Not Classified By Court: Philip H. Stillman
Case Number: 3:2022cv07094
Filed: November 11, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Presiding Judge: Charles R Breyer
Nature of Suit: American with Disabilities - Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 19, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 9, 2022 Filing 26 OPPOSITION/RESPONSE (re #18 MOTION to Strike #16 MOTION to Dismiss and for Sanctions for Plaintiff's Failure to Comply with Vexatious Litigant Prefiling Order ) filed byStarbucks Corporation. (Villamor, Myra) (Filed on 12/9/2022)
December 9, 2022 Filing 25 REPLY (re #17 Ex Parte Application re #16 MOTION to Dismiss and for Sanctions for Plaintiff's Failure to Comply with Vexatious Litigant Prefiling Order (to Stay Action Pending Ruling) ) filed byStarbucks Corporation. (Villamor, Myra) (Filed on 12/9/2022)
December 9, 2022 Filing 24 REPLY (re #16 MOTION to Dismiss and for Sanctions for Plaintiff's Failure to Comply with Vexatious Litigant Prefiling Order ) filed byStarbucks Corporation. (Villamor, Myra) (Filed on 12/9/2022)
November 29, 2022 Filing 23 NOTICE by Peter Strojnik of Prior and Superior Lien (Strojnik, Peter) (Filed on 11/29/2022)
November 29, 2022 Filing 22 NOTICE by Philip H. Stillman of Judgment Lien (Stillman, Philip) (Filed on 11/29/2022)
November 28, 2022 Filing 21 CLERK'S NOTICE VACATING MOTION TO DISMISS, TO STRIKE, FOR SANCTIONS hearing set for January 6, 2023 before the Honorable Charles R. Breyer. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.). Motion Hearing set for 1/20/2023 at 10:00 AM in San Francisco - Videoconference Only before Judge Charles R. Breyer. This proceeding will be held via a Zoom webinar.Webinar Access: All counsel, members of the public, and media may access the webinar information at #https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/crb Court Appearances: Advanced notice is required of counsel or parties who wish to be identifie d by the court as making an appearance or will be participating in the argument at the hearing. A list of names and emails must be sent to the CRD at crbcrd@cand.uscourts.gov no later than January 17, 2023 at 3:00 PM PST.General Order 58. Persons granted access to court proceedings held by telephone or videoconference are reminded that photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings, including screenshots or other visual copying of a hearing, is absolutely prohibited.Zoom Guidance and Setup: #https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/zoom/. Motion Hearing set for 1/20/2023 10:00 AM in San Francisco, - Videoconference Only before Judg e Charles R. Breyer. (ls, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/28/2022)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
November 28, 2022 Set/Reset Deadlines as to #16 MOTION to Dismiss and for Sanctions for Plaintiff's Failure to Comply with Vexatious Litigant Prefiling Order, #18 MOTION to Strike #16 MOTION to Dismiss and for Sanctions for Plaintiff's Failure to Comply with Vexatious Litigant Prefiling Order . Motion Hearing set for 1/20/2023 10:00 AM in San Francisco, - Videoconference Only before Judge Charles R. Breyer. (ls, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/28/2022)
November 25, 2022 Filing 20 OPPOSITION/RESPONSE (re #17 Ex Parte Application re #16 MOTION to Dismiss and for Sanctions for Plaintiff's Failure to Comply with Vexatious Litigant Prefiling Order (to Stay Action Pending Ruling) ) filed byPeter Strojnik. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)(Strojnik, Peter) (Filed on 11/25/2022)
November 25, 2022 Filing 19 OPPOSITION/RESPONSE (re #16 MOTION to Dismiss and for Sanctions for Plaintiff's Failure to Comply with Vexatious Litigant Prefiling Order ) filed byPeter Strojnik. (Strojnik, Peter) (Filed on 11/25/2022)
November 25, 2022 Filing 18 MOTION to Strike #16 MOTION to Dismiss and for Sanctions for Plaintiff's Failure to Comply with Vexatious Litigant Prefiling Order filed by Peter Strojnik. Motion Hearing set for 1/6/2023 10:00 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom 06, 17th Floor before Judge Charles R. Breyer. Responses due by 12/9/2022. Replies due by 12/16/2022. (Strojnik, Peter) (Filed on 11/25/2022)
November 23, 2022 Filing 17 Ex Parte Application re #16 MOTION to Dismiss and for Sanctions for Plaintiff's Failure to Comply with Vexatious Litigant Prefiling Order (to Stay Action Pending Ruling) filed by Starbucks Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Myra B. Villamor (Exhibits 1-2), #2 Proposed Order)(Villamor, Myra) (Filed on 11/23/2022)
November 23, 2022 Filing 16 MOTION to Dismiss and for Sanctions for Plaintiff's Failure to Comply with Vexatious Litigant Prefiling Order filed by Starbucks Corporation. Motion Hearing set for 1/6/2023 10:00 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom 06, 17th Floor before Judge Charles R. Breyer. Responses due by 12/7/2022. Replies due by 12/14/2022. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Myra B. Villamor (Exhibits 1-3, #2 Proposed Order)(Villamor, Myra) (Filed on 11/23/2022)
November 18, 2022 Filing 15 CLERK'S NOTICE: A Joint Case Management Statement due by 5/5/2023. Initial Case Management Conference set for 5/12/2023 at 8:30 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom 06, 17th Floor.If this action seeks accommodation or other relief, including attorney fees,pursuant to Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 USC 12191-89, the court directs, pursuant to FRCP 16, the following:a. Each plaintiff shall, pursuant to FRCP 4 (m), forthwith completeservice on any unserved defendant;b. Discovery, except for initial disclosures required by FRCP 26 (a), andall other proceedings are STAYED;c. If not previously done, each plaintiff shall forthwith serve upon eachdefendant a demand for accommodation and statement of attorney feesincurred to date (42 USC 12205; Hensly v Eckerhart, 461 US 424,429-30, 433-37 (1983));d. Each defendant shall, no later than the date for the conference of theparties specified above, serve a response to the demand foraccommodation;e. The joint case management statement shall contain, in addition to theinformation called for by FRCP 26 (f), the information set forth inparagraphs c and d. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (ls, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/18/2022)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
November 18, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Judge Charles R. Breyer for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore no longer assigned to case. Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras.Signed by The Clerk on 11/18/2022. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(jrs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/18/2022)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
November 17, 2022 Filing 13 CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because either (1) a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge, or (2) time is of the essence in deciding a pending judicial action for which the necessary consents to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction have not been secured. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED AND SHOULD BE RE-NOTICED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE JUDGE TO WHOM THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (wft, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/17/2022)
November 17, 2022 Filing 12 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Starbucks Corporation.. (Villamor, Myra) (Filed on 11/17/2022)
November 15, 2022 Filing 11 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Starbucks Corporation. Filed byPeter Strojnik. (Strojnik, Peter) (Filed on 11/15/2022)
November 15, 2022 Filing 10 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order for Cases Asserting Denial of Right of Access under Americans with Disabilities Act. (sfb, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/15/2022)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
November 14, 2022 Filing 9 STIPULATION to Extend Time to Respond to Initial Complaint filed by Starbucks Corporation. (Villamor, Myra) (Filed on 11/14/2022)
November 14, 2022 Filing 8 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 11/28/2022. (cv, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/14/2022)
November 11, 2022 Filing 7 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Starbucks Corporation re #6 Certificate of Interested Entities, #4 Declaration in Support, #2 Declaration in Support, #1 Notice of Removal, #5 Certificate of Interested Entities, #3 Declaration in Support (Villamor, Myra) (Filed on 11/11/2022)
November 11, 2022 Filing 6 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Starbucks Corporation re #1 Notice of Removal, (Villamor, Myra) (Filed on 11/11/2022)
November 11, 2022 Filing 5 Certificate of Interested Entities by Starbucks Corporation re #1 Notice of Removal, (Villamor, Myra) (Filed on 11/11/2022)
November 11, 2022 Filing 4 Declaration of Andy Lee in Support of #1 Notice of Removal, filed byStarbucks Corporation. (Related document(s) #1 ) (Villamor, Myra) (Filed on 11/11/2022)
November 11, 2022 Filing 3 Declaration of Angela Webster-Lam in Support of #1 Notice of Removal, filed byStarbucks Corporation. (Related document(s) #1 ) (Villamor, Myra) (Filed on 11/11/2022)
November 11, 2022 Filing 2 Declaration of Myra B. Villamor in Support of #1 Notice of Removal, filed byStarbucks Corporation. (Related document(s) #1 ) (Villamor, Myra) (Filed on 11/11/2022)
November 11, 2022 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Superior Court, County of San Francisco. Their case number is 22CV402294. (Filing fee $402 receipt number ACANDC-17720222). Filed byStarbucks Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Villamor, Myra) (Filed on 11/11/2022)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Strojnik v. Starbucks Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Peter Strojnik
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Starbucks Corporation
Represented By: Myra B Villamor
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Not classified by court: Philip H. Stillman
Represented By: Philip Harris Stillman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?