Cases 1 - 10 of 230
Moraya Investments, LLCv. Strojnik et al
as 3:2022cv07722
Plaintiff:
Moraya Investments, LLC
Defendant:
Peter Strojnik and Philip H. Stillman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335 Interpleader Action
v. Strojnik et al
as 4:2022mc80330
Defendant:
Peter Strojnik and Philip H. Stillman
Plaintiff:
Cris C Vaughan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Interpleader Action
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv07094
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Classified By Court:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Peter Strojnik, Sr. v. USDC-CASA
as 22-70123
Not Classified By Court:
In re: PETER STROJNIK, Sr. and SCG AMERICA CONSTRUCTION INC., doing business as Hyatt Regency Orange County
Petitioner:
PETER STROJNIK, Sr.
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SANTA ANA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00682
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00533
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Classified By Court:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-55439
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-55443
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00452
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12102 Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Disability Definition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv08181
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
