S.K. v. Uber Technologies, Inc et al
Plaintiff: S.K.
Defendant: Rasier-CA, LLC, Uber Technologies, Inc and Rasier, LLC
Case Number: 3:2024cv04669
Filed: August 1, 2024
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Presiding Judge: Charles R Breyer
Nature of Suit: P.I.: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 8, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 8, 2024 Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed filed by S.K. Rasier, LLC served on 8/8/2024, answer due 10/7/2024; Rasier-CA, LLC served on 8/8/2024, answer due 10/7/2024; Uber Technologies, Inc served on 8/8/2024, answer due 10/7/2024. (Goldenberg, Marlene) (Filed on 8/8/2024) Modified on 8/8/2024 (mcl, COURT STAFF).
August 2, 2024 Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Rasier, LLC, Rasier-CA, LLC, Uber Technologies, Inc. (mcl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/2/2024)
August 2, 2024 Filing 3 Case assigned to Judge Charles R. Breyer. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. (mbc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/2/2024)
August 1, 2024 DIRECT FILED MEMBER CASE OPENED: MDL 3084, S.K. v. Uber Technologies, Inc et al, Opened in California Northern District as 24-cv-04669-CRB cc: JPMDL (mcl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/1/2024)
August 1, 2024 Cases associated: Create association to 3:23-md-03084-CRB. (mcl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/1/2024)
August 1, 2024 Filing 2 Proposed Summons. (Goldenberg, Marlene) (Filed on 8/1/2024)
August 1, 2024 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Rasier, LLC, Rasier-CA, LLC, Uber Technologies, Inc ( Filing fee $ 405, receipt number ACANDC-19684684.). Filed by S.K.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Goldenberg, Marlene) (Filed on 8/1/2024)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: S.K. v. Uber Technologies, Inc et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Rasier-CA, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Uber Technologies, Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Rasier, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: S.K.
Represented By: Marlene Jaye Goldenberg
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?