Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 252
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01821
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 Civil Rights of Handicapped Child
Nagle et al v. Pottsville Area School District et al
as 3:2024cv01808
Plaintiff: Lydia Ulrich, Jeffery Hill, Athena Gerlek and others
Defendant: Pottsville Area School District, Sarah Yoder, Kayla Peters and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Young v. Espino et al
as 3:2024cv01825
Defendant: B. Delgado, A. Carillo, James S. Hill and others
Plaintiff: Zuri S.K. Young
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
S.K., a minor child by and through her Guardian Ad Litem, Alexander Kashton v. Beech-Nut Nutrition Company, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv06212
Defendant: Nurture, LLC, Hero A.G., Walmart, Inc. and others
Plaintiff: S.K., a minor child by and through her Guardian Ad Litem, Alexander Kashton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv06061
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
CHIEF ISRAEL X et al v. NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY
as 2:2024cv08695
Plaintiff: CHIEF ISRAEL X, L.K., C.K. and others
Defendant: NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY and NJDCP & P (BERGEN COUNTY)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
S.K. et al v. New York City Public Schools We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2024cv05991
Plaintiff: S.K. on behalf of her child R.K., a minor and S.K.
Defendant: New York City Department of Education and New York City Public Schools
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1415 IDEA: Challenge decision re education for handicapped
S.K. v. Uber Technologies, Inc et al
as 3:2024cv04669
Defendant: Rasier-CA, LLC, Uber Technologies, Inc and Rasier, LLC
Plaintiff: S.K.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
HERSEE et al v. USA
as 1:2024cv00997
Plaintiff: STEPHEN D. HERSEE and JANE S.K. MILLS
Defendant: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
Bloch et al v. Progress Software Corporation et al
as 1:2024cv11567
Defendant: Progress Software Corporation and Maximus Federal Services, Inc.
Plaintiff: Robert Plotke, Ben Dieck, Holly Burke and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?