Jones v. Borla
Plaintiff: Amos Jones
Defendant: Acting Warden Edward J. Borla
Case Number: 3:2024cv07095
Filed: October 10, 2024
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Presiding Judge: Jacqueline Scott Corley
Referring Judge: PSLC JNE
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 12, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 12, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Thomas S. Hixson no longer assigned to case, Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. Signed by Clerk on 11/12/2024. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(mbc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/12/2024)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
November 6, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Signed by Magistrate Judge Thomas S. Hixson on 11/5/2024. (Attachments: #1 Envelope service/mailing label)(rmm2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/6/2024)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
October 28, 2024 Filing 6 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Amos Jones. (msr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/28/2024)
October 25, 2024 Filing 5 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Amos Jones.. (msr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/25/2024)
October 16, 2024 Filing 4 Notice of Assignment of Prisoner Case to Magistrate Judge (ark, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/16/2024)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
October 10, 2024 Filing 3 CLERK'S NOTICE re completion of In Forma Pauperis affidavit or payment of filing fee due within 28 days. IFP Form due by 11/18/2024. (msr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/10/2024)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
October 10, 2024 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Amos Jones. (msr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/10/2024)
October 10, 2024 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Edward J. Borla. Filed by Amos Jones. (msr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/10/2024)
October 10, 2024 Remark: Copy of Docket and Clerk's Notice IFP emailed to CTF. (msr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/10/2024)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Jones v. Borla
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Acting Warden Edward J. Borla
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Amos Jones
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?