Peck v. Astrue
Plaintiff: Timothy M. Peck
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue
Case Number: 4:2009cv02600
Filed: June 11, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Office: Oakland Office
County: Napa
Presiding Judge: Saundra Brown Armstrong
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: 42:405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 22, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 23 STIPULATION AND ORDER re 22 Stipulation filed by Timothy M. Peck, Michael J. Astrue. Signed by Judge ARMSTRONG on 2/22/11. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/22/2011)
September 27, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 19 JUDGMENT, ***Civil Case Terminated.. Signed by Judge ARMSTRONG on 9/24/10. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/27/2010)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Peck v. Astrue
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Timothy M. Peck
Represented By: David Joseph Linden
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?