Morrison et al v. Credit Acceptance Corporation
Andrea Morrison, Erlinda Del Rosario and Marie Del Rosario |
Credit Acceptance Corporation |
4:2010cv00549 |
February 8, 2010 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
Oakland Office |
Alameda |
Phyllis J. Hamilton |
Other Statutory Actions |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 17 STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE re 16 Stipulation filed by Credit Acceptance Corporation. Joint Case Management Statement due by 9/23/2010. Case Management Conference set for 9/30/2010 02:00 PM. Signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton on 7/30/10. (nah, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/30/2010) |
Filing 15 STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE re 14 Stipulation, filed by Credit Acceptance Corporation. Joint Case Management Statement due by 7/29/2010. Initial Case Management Conference set for 8/5/2010 02:00 PM. Signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton on 5/20/10. (nah, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/20/2010) |
Filing 10 ORDER SETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. Signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton on 3/9/10. (nah, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/9/2010) |
Filing 6 STIPULATION AND ORDER ENLARGING TIME TO RESPOND re 5 Stipulation filed by Credit Acceptance Corporation. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 2/17/10. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/17/2010) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.