Greater Los Angeles Agency on Deafness, Inc. et al v. Time Warner, Inc.
Plaintiff: Daniel Jacob, Edward Kelly, Jennifer Olson and Greater Los Angeles Agency on Deafness, Inc.
Defendant: Time Warner, Inc.
Case Number: 4:2011cv03458
Filed: July 14, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Office: Oakland Office
County: Alameda
Presiding Judge: Laurel Beeler
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 18, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 72 ORDER DISMISSING ALL CLAIMS. Signed by Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler on 9/18/2014. (lsS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/18/2014)
March 23, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 46 Order by Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler denying 13 Motion to Strike.(lblc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/23/2012)
October 5, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER CONTINUING HEARING TO DECEMBER 1, 2011. Signed by Judge Beeler on 10/5/2011. (lblc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/5/2011)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Greater Los Angeles Agency on Deafness, Inc. et al v. Time Warner, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Daniel Jacob
Represented By: Rachel Elizabeth Brill
Represented By: Linda Mary Dardarian
Represented By: Elizabeth Rauh Leonard
Represented By: Anna Rachel Levine
Represented By: Laurence Wayne Paradis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Edward Kelly
Represented By: Rachel Elizabeth Brill
Represented By: Linda Mary Dardarian
Represented By: Elizabeth Rauh Leonard
Represented By: Anna Rachel Levine
Represented By: Laurence Wayne Paradis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jennifer Olson
Represented By: Rachel Elizabeth Brill
Represented By: Linda Mary Dardarian
Represented By: Elizabeth Rauh Leonard
Represented By: Anna Rachel Levine
Represented By: Laurence Wayne Paradis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Greater Los Angeles Agency on Deafness, Inc.
Represented By: Laurence Wayne Paradis
Represented By: Anna Rachel Levine
Represented By: Elizabeth Rauh Leonard
Represented By: Linda Mary Dardarian
Represented By: Rachel Elizabeth Brill
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Time Warner, Inc.
Represented By: Thomas R. Burke
Represented By: Janet Lynn Grumer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?