Cases 1 - 10 of 62
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv07971
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv07972
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
United States of America v. Werk
as 24-3082
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
DANIEL JACOB WERK
Silsattanak v. The State of Nevada ex rel. Nevada Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2024cv00185
Plaintiff:
Erik Silsattanak
Defendant:
The State of Nevada ex rel. Nevada Department of Corrections, James Dzurenda, William Gittere and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JACOBS v. ZAKEN
as 2:2024cv00601
Plaintiff:
DANIEL JACOBS
Defendant:
MICHAEL ZAKEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Jacobs v. Zaken
as 1:2024cv00467
Plaintiff:
Daniel Jacobs
Defendant:
Michael Zaken
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Keating v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2023cv16793
Plaintiff:
Joseph F. Keating
Defendant:
City of Chicago, Officer Migdalia Bulnes, Jenny Christoforakis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv14901
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
McGill et al v. Foster et al
as 1:2023cv01134
Not Classified By Court:
Gail Mooney
Plaintiff:
Chase McGill and Heather Taylor
Defendant:
Daniel Jacob Foster, Cauble Enterprises, Inc. and Fedex Ground Package System, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Jacobs v. Zaken et al
as 4:2023cv01057
Petitioner:
Daniel Jacobs
Respondent:
Michael Zaken and PA State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
