Jacobs v. Zaken et al
Daniel Jacobs |
Michael Zaken and PA State Attorney General |
4:2023cv01057 |
June 26, 2023 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
William I Arbuckle |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 24, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 ORDER - it is ORDERED that: (1) Petitioner's application requesting leave to proceed without prepaying fees #6 is MOOT. Petitioner is advised that the Court received and processed his filing fee. His petition has already been deemed filed. (2) Petitioner is reminded that his response to the Court's 7/14/2023, order (Doc. 5) is due on or before 8/28/2023. Signed by Magistrate Judge William I. Arbuckle on 7/24/2023. (caw) |
Filing 7 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Daniel Jacobs. (ea) |
Filing 6 MOTION/Application to proceed in forma pauperis by Daniel Jacobs. (Filing fee paid and processed) (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter) (ea) Modified on 7/24/2023 (ea). |
Filing 5 ORDER - it is ORDERED that: (1) If he chooses, Petitioner may amend or withdraw the current 2254 petition (Doc. 1) without prejudice to filing one complete 2254 petition raising all grounds for relief from his conviction. (2) The Petitioner is required to notify the court of his decision to amend or withdraw his petition on or before 8/28/2023, by completing the attached notice of election form. (3) If Petitioner chooses to amend rather than withdraw this petition, he is required to use the Court's standard form see Local Rule 83.32.1, and his amended petition must be submitted with his completed notice of election form on or before 8/28/2023. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to send Petitioner a copy of the Courts standard form for a 2254 petition along with this order. (4) If Petitioner does not submit a completed notice of election form on or before 8/28/2023, the Court will rule on the current 2254 petition as filed. (5) If the one-year limitations period would expire before 8/28/2023, the limitations period is tolled from the date of this order until the petitioners notification is filed, or until this deadline passes, whichever is earliest. In these circumstances, and if the petitioner decides to file an all-inclusive 2254 petition raising all grounds for relief, the petitioners response must also be accompanied by his new 2254 petition. Amended Pleadings due by 8/28/2023. Notice of Compliance due by 8/28/2023. Signed by Magistrate Judge William I. Arbuckle on 7/14/2023. (caw) |
Receipt of payment from SCI in the amount of $5.00 for Writ of Habeas Corpus. Transaction posted on 7/5/2023. Receipt number 333105326 processed by AO. (tp) |
Filing 4 Filing fee: $ 5, receipt number 333105326. Petition is now deemed FILED. (sm) |
Filing 3 (THIRTY (30) DAY ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER) directing the prisoner to pay the filing fee or file a signed Application to Proceed IFP within 30 days or case will be dismissed. Signed by EA on 06/26/2023. (Attachments: #1 IFP (Habeas Corpus)) (ea) |
Filing 2 PRO SE LETTER ISSUED providing the case number. (ea) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus lodged as no filing fee was paid and no Motion for In Forma Pauperis was filed, filed by Daniel Jacobs. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter, #2 Non-Precedential Superior Court Decision on Appeal from PCRA Order, #3 Request to Amend) (ea) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.