Harvey et al v. City of Antioch et al
| Edrick Harvey and Mary Octavia Dorrough |
| City of Antioch, Antioch Police Department, James Hyde, Allan Cantando, James Stenger, Michael Mellone, D. Bittner, Wisecarver, Vincelet, Mortimer, City of Pittsburg, Pittsburg Police Department and Aaron L. Baker |
| 4:2011cv04986 |
| October 7, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Oakland Office |
| Contra Costa |
| Donna M. Ryu |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
56
STIPULATION AND ORDER RE CONSENT to Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge.. Signed by Judge ARMSTRONG on 7/29/13. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/29/2013)
|
|
Filing
50
STIPULATION AND ORDER Case Management Conference set for 7/17/2013 02:30 PM. VIA TELEPHONE. Signed by Judge ARMSTRONG on 3/12/13. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/12/2013)
|
|
Filing
44
ORDER re 42 MOTION to Withdraw as Guardian Ad Litem and to Appoint New Guardian Ad Litem filed by Edrick Harvey, Mary Octavia Dorrough. Signed by Judge ARMSTRONG on 8/7/12. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/8/2012)
|
|
Filing
6
ORDER: The petition for an order appointing Mary Octavia Dorrough as guardian ad litem for petitioner "AS" is GRANTED re 4 Received Document filed by Edrick Harvey, Mary Octavia Dorrough. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu on 10/26/11. (ig, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/26/2011)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
