First Amendment Coalition v. U.S. Department of Justice
| First Amendment Coalition |
| U.S. Department of Justice |
| 4:2012cv01013 |
| February 29, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Oakland Office |
| Marin |
| Claudia Wilken |
| Freedom of Information Act |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 552 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
109
ORDER by Judge Claudia Wilken GRANTING PLAINTIFFS 96 MOTION TO VACATE AND DENYING PLAINTIFFS 103 MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS FEES AND COSTS. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/15/2014)
|
|
Filing
95
ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE. Motions due by 9/25/2014; Responses due by 10/10/2014; Replies due by 10/24/2014. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 9/2/2014. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/2/2014)
|
|
Filing
91
ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 5/22/2014. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/22/2014)
|
|
Filing
86
ORDER by Judge Claudia Wilken GRANTING DEFENDANTS 63 MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DENYING PLAINTIFFS 66 CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/11/2014)
|
|
Filing
80
ORDER Granting 79 Stipulation. Reset Deadlines as to 66 Cross MOTION for Summary Judgment and 63 Second MOTION for Summary Judgment . Motion Hearing set for 1/23/2014 02:00 PM before Hon. Claudia Wilken. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 12/6/2013. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/6/2013)
|
|
Filing
75
ORDER by Judge Claudia Wilken Granting 74 Stipulation Regarding Amendment to Schedule. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/24/2013)
|
|
Filing
60
ORDER by Judge Claudia Wilken SETTING A FURTHER SCHEDULE (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/3/2013)
|
|
Filing
53
ORDER by Judge Claudia Wilken Granting 51 Motion for Leave to File and 52 Stipulation. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/11/2013)
|
|
Filing
47
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULE FOR FURTHER BRIEFING ON CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 1/10/2013. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/10/2013)
|
|
Filing
36
ORDER STRIKING PLAINTIFFS 33 SEPARATE EVIDENTIARY OBJECTIONS AND GRANTING PLAINTIFF LEAVE TO FILE AN AMENDED OPPOSITION AND CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 10/9/2012. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/9/2012)
|
|
Filing
27
ORDER by Judge Claudia Wilken DENYING IN PART, AND GRANTING IN PART, 20 MOTION TO STAY PROCEEDINGS AND DIRECTING PARTIES TO MEET AND CONFER.(ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/24/2012)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: First Amendment Coalition v. U.S. Department of Justice | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: U.S. Department of Justice | |
| Represented By: | Amy Powell |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: First Amendment Coalition | |
| Represented By: | Jeff Glasser |
| Represented By: | Thomas R. Burke |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
