Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 36
Jesse Hernandez, et al v. County of Monterey, et al
as 23-16027
Plaintiff / Appellee: JESSE HERNANDEZ, ROBERT ROBERT, RICHARD MURPHY and others
Intervenor / Appellee: MONTEREY COUNTY WEEKLY, FIRST AMENDMENT COALITION, PATRICIA RAMIREZ and others
Defendant / Appellant: COUNTY OF MONTEREY, MONTEREY COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE and CALIFORNIA FORENSIC MEDICAL GROUP
Jane Sullivan, et al v. University of Washington, et al
as 23-35313
Plaintiff / Appellee: JANE SULLIVAN and P. POES, 1-75; Individually and on behalf of others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellee: UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON, a Washington public corporation and ELIZA SAUNDERS, Director of Public Records and Open Public Meetings, University of Washington
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant: PEOPLE FOR THE ETHICAL TREATMENT OF ANIMALS, INC.
Amicus Curiae: REPORTERS COMMITTEE FOR FREEDOM OF THE PRESS, CALIFORNIANS AWARE, FIRST AMENDMENT COALITION and others
Students for Fair Admissions, Inc., et al v. Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press
as 23-1079
Plaintiff / Appellee: STUDENTS FOR FAIR ADMISSIONS, INC.
Defendant / Appellee: PRESIDENT AND FELLOWS OF HARVARD COLLEGE
Defendant: BOARD OF OVERSEERS OF HARVARD COLLEGE
Interested Party: REPORTERS COMMITTEE FOR FREEDOM OF THE PRESS, SARAH COLE, NEW ENGLAND FIRST AMENDMENT COALITION and others
In Re:Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press
as 23-1088
Petitioner: REPORTERS COMMITTEE FOR FREEDOM OF THE PRESS
Respondent: STUDENTS FOR FAIR ADMISSIONS, INC., PRESIDENT AND FELLOWS OF HARVARD COLLEGE, BOARD OF OVERSEERS OF HARVARD COLLEGE and others
Interested Party: BOSTON PUBLIC SCHOOLS, AMERICAN COUNCIL ON EDUCATION, and 36 other Higher Education Organizations, MICHAEL P. KEANE and others
Doe v. Volokh We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 22-1525
Plaintiff / Appellee: JOHN DOE
Intervenor: EUGENE VOLOKH
Defendant: NEW HAMPSHIRE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and LISBON, NH
Amicus Curiae: ASSOCIATED PRESS, BOSTON GLOBE MEDIA PARTNERS, LLC, CALIFORNIANS AWARE and others
Martinez et al v. The City of Fresno We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv00307
Plaintiff: Desiree Martinez, Fresno Homeless Union, Faith in the Valley and others
Defendant: The City of Fresno
Amicus Curiae: First Amendment Coalition, California News Publishers Association, Californians Aware and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Courthouse News Service v. Gabel
as 21-3098
Plaintiff / Appellee: Courthouse News Service, Vermont Press Association, Inc., New England First Amendment Coalition and others
Defendant / Appellant: Patricia Gabel, In her official capacity as the State Court Administrator of the Supreme Court of the State of Vermont, Amanda Stites, in her official capacity as Clerk of Court for Addison, Bennington, and Rutland Counties, Margaret Villeneuve, in her official capacity as Clerk of Court for Caledonia, Essex, Orleans, and Washington Counties and others
Courthouse News Service et al v. Gabel et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2021cv00132
Defendant: Christine Brock, Patricia Gabel, Anne Damone and others
Plaintiff: Courthouse News Service, Gray Media Group, Inc. doing business as WCAX-TV, Vermont Press Association, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Carmody et al v. Federal Bureau of Investigation
as 3:2020cv04809
Plaintiff: Bryan Carmody and First Amendment Coalition
Defendant: Federal Bureau of Investigation
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
American Civil Liberties Union of Southern California et al v. Harber-Pickens et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv00889
Plaintiff: First Amendment Coalition, American Civil Liberties Union of Southern California, Tameca Spriggs and others
Defendant: Tamarah Harber-Pickens, Donny Youngblood and Judith K. Dulcich
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?