Quach et al v. Cao et al
| John Quach, Tug Tin Mathesius, Max Mathesius, Jacqueline Cao and Sean Cao |
| City of Novato, City of Novato Police Department, James Berg, County of Marin, County of Marin Sheriff's Department and Robert T. Doyle |
| 4:2016cv00121 |
| January 8, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Oakland Office |
| Marin |
| Donna M. Ryu |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
31
ORDER RE: PLAINTIFF'S APPLICATIONS TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS; DISMISSING CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu on July 25, 2016. (ig, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/25/2016)
|
|
Filing
24
ORDER re: 23 Notice (Other) filed by Max Mathesius and Applications to Proceed in forma pauperis. The court extends the Plaintiffs' deadline to file an amended complaint to address the deficiencies noted in the June 23, 2016 Order 17 to July 20, 2016. Failure to file a timely amended complaint may result in a dismissal without prejudice for failure to prosecute the case. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu on 7/6/2016. (dmrlc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/6/2016)
|
|
Filing
16
ORDER CONTINUING INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE: Joint Case Management Statement due by 7/13/2016. Initial Case Management Conference continued to 7/20/2016 01:30 PM. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu on 4/13/16. (ig, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/13/2016)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
