Soontjens v. Dynavax Technologies Corporation et al
David Soontjens |
Dynavax Technologies Corporation, Eddie Gray and Michael S. Ostrach |
3:2016cv06690 |
November 18, 2016 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
Oakland Office |
Outside US |
Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers |
Securities/Commodities/Exchanges |
15 U.S.C. ยง 78 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 82 ORDER by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers granting 68 Motion to Dismiss Consolidated Second Amended Complaint without leave to amend. This action is DISMISSED. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/4/2018) |
Filing 61 ORDER by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers granting 51 Motion to Dismiss with Leave to Amend. Amended Pleadings due by 10/3/2017. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/12/2017) |
Filing 40 ORDER CONSOLIDATING RELATED ACTIONS, APPOINTING LEAD PLAINTIFF AND LEAD COUNSEL by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers; granting (29) Motion to Appoint Lead Plaintiff and Lead Counsel ; granting (29) Motion to Consolidate Cases in cases 4:16-cv-06690-YGR and 4:16-cv-6707-YGR. The docket in Case 4:16-cv-6690-YGR shall constitute the Master Docket for this action. The Rosen Law Firm P.A. is appointed as Lead Counsel. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/31/2017) |
Filing 13 ORDER OF RECUSAL. Signed by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. on 12/8/2016. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/8/2016) |
Filing 9 ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 7 Motion for Pro Hac Vice as to Hood, J. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/5/2016) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.