Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Holt v. Gray Television Inc et al
as 2:2024cv00398
Plaintiff:
Eddie Gray Holt
Defendant:
Gray Television Inc, WTOK TV, Jacque Harms and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gray et al v. Mills et al
as 5:2024cv00268
Plaintiff:
Fabian Eddy Gray and Adelma Mestas
Defendant:
Nicholas Mills and Patrick F. Mays
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Holt v. City of Meridian, Mississippi et al
as 3:2023cv00484
Plaintiff:
Eddie Gray Holt
Defendant:
City of Meridian, Mississippi, Meridian Police Department, Chris Read and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
United States of America v. Simon
as 20-584
Defendant:
Yvette Lubrun, Jillian Walcott, Rashaun McKay, AKA Buster and others
Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Jamal Simon
Bryan Bonham v. Bob Bear, et al
as 19-15157
Defendant / Appellee:
CORDELIA DUNFIELD, CONNIE BISBEE, JAMES ALLEN and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRYAN P. BONHAM
Kwok Pang v. Dynavax Technologies Corporati, et al
as 18-16250
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KWOK PANG, Lead Plaintiff
Defendant - Appellee:
DYNAVAX TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION, EDDIE GRAY, MICHAEL S. OSTRACH and others
Shumake v. Gray et al
as 4:2017cv06886
Plaintiff:
Michael Shumake
Miscellaneou:
Dynavax Technologies Corp.
Defendant:
Eddie Gray, Michael S Ostrach, Stanley A Plotkin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bonham v. Bear et al
as 2:2017cv02460
Defendant:
James Allen, Tami Bass, Bob Bear and others
Plaintiff:
Bryan P. Bonham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Soontjens v. Dynavax Technologies Corporation et al
as 3:2016cv06690
Plaintiff:
David Soontjens
Defendant:
Dynavax Technologies Corporation , Eddie Gray and Michael S. Ostrach
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Shumake v. Ostrach et al
as 3:2016cv06707
Defendant:
Michael S. Ostrach , Eddie Gray and Dynavax Technologies Corporation
Plaintiff:
Michael Shumake
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
