McElroy v. Adam et al
| E.J. McElroy |
| Adam, PBSP Medical Dept. & Dental Dept. and Olsen |
| 4:2017cv03348 |
| June 9, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Oakland Office |
| San Joaquin |
| PSLC GRC |
| Donna M. Ryu |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
55
ORDER by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers denying 37 Second Motion for Preliminary Injunction and TRO; terminating as moot 54 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/15/2019)
|
|
Filing
49
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S FIRST REQUEST FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION AND TRO; DENYING HIS REQUESTS FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL; GRANTING DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; AND DIRECTING DEFENDAN TSS TO FILE RESPONSE TO SECOND REQUEST FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION AND REPLY TO OPPOSITION by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers; denying 38 Motion ; denying 44 Motion ; granting 45 Motion for Extension of Time to File; denying 29 Motion ; denying 30 Motion. Plaintiff Replies due by 3/6/2019. Responses to Dkt. no. 37 is due by 2/6/2019. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/9/2019)
|
|
Filing
9
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu granting 4 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis and denying 3 and 6 Motion to Appoint Counsel. (ig, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/23/2017)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
