Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv00729
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Johnson v. Marks, et al.
as 26-5727
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY H. JOHNSON
Defendant:
DANA MARKS, E. PARKS, J. MAINWARING and others
Olsen v. Gowland et al
as 5:2026cv00626
Plaintiff:
Joyce Olsen
Defendant:
Michael Gowland and Ellen Gowland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Adams et al v. Islamic Republic of Iran
as 1:2026cv07485
Plaintiff:
Jamaal Adams, Janine Adelaja, Linda Alston and others
Defendant:
Islamic Republic of Iran
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2333 Civil Remedies: Anti-Terrorism Act of 1991
Olsen, Erika v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2026cv00814
Plaintiff:
Erika Jenifer Olsen
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Olsen v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2026cv02440
Plaintiff:
Tonya Olsen
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Olsen v. FCA US, LLC
as 3:2026cv04868
Plaintiff:
Terri Lynn Olsen
Defendant:
FCA US, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 231
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2026cv00579
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Twenty-Nine Palms Band of Mission Indians v. County of Riverside, et al.,
as 5:2026cv04833
Plaintiff:
Twenty-Nine Palms Band of Mission Indians
Defendant:
County of Riverside, Riverside County Board of Supervisors, Jose Medina and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv10143
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
