In re Netflix, Inc. Securities Litigation
| Fiyyaz Pirani and Cleveland Bakers and Teamsters Pension Fynd |
| Netflix, Inc., Reed Hastings, Ted Sarandos, Spencer Neumann and Gregory Peters |
| Ty Correy |
| Cleveland Bakers and Teamsters Pension Fund |
| 4:2022cv02672 |
| May 3, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Donna M Ryu |
| Jon S Tigar |
| Securities/Commodities |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 5, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 30 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Reed Hastings, Netflix, Inc., Spencer Neumann, Gregory Peters, Ted Sarandos. Filed by Fiyyaz Pirani. (Prongay, Robert) (Filed on 12/12/2022) Modified on 12/16/2022 (anj, COURT STAFF). |
Filing 29
ORDER granting #28 Stipulation regarding filing Schedule: Lead Plaintiff shall file Amended Complaint by 12/12/2022; Defendants shall file their Motion to Dismiss by 2/10/2023; Lead Plaintiff shall file Opposition by 3/27/2023; Defendants shall file their Reply by 4/26/2023. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on 10/21/2022. (ig, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/21/2022)
|
| Filing 28 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER REGARDING FILING SCHEDULE filed by Fiyyaz Pirani, Ty Correy, Reed Hastings, Nexflix, Inc., Spencer Neumann, Gregory Peters and Ted Sarandos. (Linehan, Charles) (Filed on 10/20/2022) Modified on 10/21/2022 (jml, COURT STAFF). |
|
Filing 27
ORDER CONSOLIDATING CASES AND APPOINTING LEAD PLAINTIFF AND LEAD COUNSEL * AS MODIFIED * by Judge Jon S. Tigar granting (18) Motion to Appoint Lead Plaintiff and Lead Counsel ; granting (18) Motion to Consolidate Cases; granting (20) Motion to Consolidate Cases; granting (21) Motion to Consolidate Cases in case 4:22-cv-02672-JST. (mll, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/11/2022)
|
| Filing 26 CLERK'S NOTICE VACATING MOTION HEARING. Before the Court are the Motions to Appoint Lead Plaintiff and Lead Counsel and to Consolidate Cases. ECF Nos. #18 , #20 , #21 . Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 78(b) and Civil Local Rule 7-1(b), the Court finds the matters suitable for disposition without oral argument. The hearing on these matters, currently scheduled for, September 29, 2022 is hereby VACATED. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (mll, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/21/2022) |
| Filing 25 NOTICE by Fiyyaz Pirani re #18 MOTION to Appoint Lead Plaintiff and Lead Counsel MOTION to Consolidate Cases [Notice that Motion Is Not Opposed] (Prongay, Robert) (Filed on 7/27/2022) |
| Filing 24 OPPOSITION/RESPONSE (re #21 Notice of Motion of TY Correy for Consolidation of Related Cases, Appointment as Lead Plaintiff and Approval of his choice of Lead Counsel < ) filed by Fiyyaz Pirani. (Prongay, Robert) (Filed on 7/19/2022) Modified on 7/20/2022 (anj, COURT STAFF). |
| Filing 23 OPPOSITION/RESPONSE (re #18 MOTION to Appoint Lead Plaintiff and Lead Counsel MOTION to Consolidate Cases ) filed by Reed Hastings, Netflix, Inc., Spencer Neumann, Ted Sarandos. (Walters, Diane) (Filed on 7/19/2022) Modified on 7/20/2022 (anj, COURT STAFF). |
| Filing 22 NOTICE of Non-Opposition by Ty Correy re #18 MOTION to Appoint Lead Plaintiff and Lead Counsel (Straus, Alex) (Filed on 7/15/2022) Modified on 7/18/2022 (anj, COURT STAFF). |
| Filing 21 Notice of Motion of TY Correy for Consolidation of Related Cases, Appointment as Lead Plaintiff and Approval of his choice of Lead Counsel filed by Ty Correy. Motion Hearing set for 9/29/2022 02:00 PM in Oakland, Courtroom 6, 2nd Floor before Judge Jon S. Tigar. Responses due by 7/19/2022. Replies due by 7/26/2022. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum, #2 Declaration Alex R. Straus, #3 Exhibit A, #4 Exhibit B, #5 Exhibit C, #6 Exhibit D, #7 Exhibit E, #8 Proposed Order)(Straus, Alex) (Filed on 7/6/2022) Modified on 7/7/2022 (anj, COURT STAFF). |
| Filing 20 Notice of Motion of TY Correy for Consolidation of Related Cases, Appointment as Lead Plaintiff and Approval of his choice of Lead Counsel filed by Ty Correy. Responses due by 7/19/2022. Replies due by 7/26/2022. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Proposed Order)(Straus, Alex) (Filed on 7/5/2022) Modified on 7/7/2022 (anj, COURT STAFF). |
| Filing 19 Declaration of Robert V. Prongay in Support of #18 MOTION to Appoint Lead Plaintiff and Lead Counsel MOTION to Consolidate Cases filed byFiyyaz Pirani. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Press Release, #2 Exhibit B - Financial Interest Analysis, #3 Exhibit C - Financial Interest Analysis, #4 Exhibit D - Declaration of Fiyyaz Pirani, #5 Exhibit E - GPM Firm Resume)(Related document(s) #18 ) (Prongay, Robert) (Filed on 7/5/2022) |
| Filing 18 MOTION to Appoint Lead Plaintiff and Lead Counsel , MOTION to Consolidate Cases filed by Fiyyaz Pirani. Motion Hearing set for 9/29/2022 02:00 PM in Oakland, Courtroom 6, 2nd Floor before Judge Jon S. Tigar. Responses due by 7/19/2022. Replies due by 7/26/2022. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Prongay, Robert) (Filed on 7/5/2022) |
|
Filing 17
ORDER REGARDING RESPONSE TO COMPLAINT AND CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND DEADLINES by Judge Jon S. Tigar granting (16) Stipulation in case 4:22-cv-02672-JST; granting (22) Stipulation in case 4:22-cv-03164-JST. (mll, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/1/2022)
|
| Filing 16 STIPULATION REGARDING RESPONSE TO COMPLAINT AND CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND DEADLINES WITH PROPOSED ORDER filed by Reed Hastings, Netflix, Inc., Spencer Neumann, Ted Sarandos, Fiyyaz Pirani, Cleveland Bakers and Teamsters Pension Fund. (Walters, Diane) (Filed on 7/1/2022) Modified on 7/5/2022 (anj, COURT STAFF). |
|
Filing 15
ORDER RELATING CASE. Motions terminated: (14 in 4:22-cv-02672-JST) ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION Order that cases are related and case reassigned to the Hon. Jon S. Tigar filed by Cleveland Bakers and Teamsters Pension Fynd. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on June 30, 2022. (mll, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/30/2022)
|
| Filing 14 ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION Order that cases are related and case reassigned to the Hon. Jon S. Tigar filed by Cleveland Bakers and Teamsters Pension Fynd. Responses due by 7/5/2022. (Attachments: #1 Stipulation In Support of Administrative Motion, #2 Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Graham, Mary) (Filed on 6/29/2022) |
| Filing 13 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by Fiyyaz Pirani. Service waived by Reed Hastings waiver sent on 5/11/2022, answer due 7/11/2022; Netflix, Inc. waiver sent on 5/11/2022, answer due 7/11/2022; Spencer Neumann waiver sent on 5/11/2022, answer due 7/11/2022; Ted Sarandos waiver sent on 5/11/2022, answer due 7/11/2022. (Linehan, Charles) (Filed on 5/23/2022) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance by Diane Marie Walters (Walters, Diane) (Filed on 5/20/2022) |
| Filing 11 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Reed Hastings, Netflix, Inc., Spencer Neumann, Ted Sarandos and Certification of Interested Entities or Persons Pursuant to Civil L.R. 3-15 (Eggleton, Keith) (Filed on 5/20/2022) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Keith E. Eggleton (Eggleton, Keith) (Filed on 5/20/2022) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Publication of SEC Class Action Notice by Fiyyaz Pirani (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - PSLRA Notice)(Rajesh, Pavithra) (Filed on 5/11/2022) Modified on 5/12/2022 (anj, COURT STAFF). |
| Filing 8 Summons Issued as to Reed Hastings, Netflix, Inc., Spencer Neumann, Ted Sarandos. (anj, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/6/2022) |
| Filing 7 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. Case Management Statement due by 7/26/2022. Initial Case Management Conference set for 8/2/2022 02:00 PM in Oakland, Courtroom 6, 2nd Floor. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(anj, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/6/2022) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Judge Jon S. Tigar for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu no longer assigned to case. Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. Signed by the Clerk on 5/6/2022. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(anj, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/6/2022)
|
| Filing 5 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 5/18/2022. (jrs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/4/2022) |
| Filing 4 CERTIFICATE of Counsel re #1 Complaint by Robert Vincent Prongay on behalf of Fiyyaz Pirani (Prongay, Robert) (Filed on 5/3/2022) |
| Filing 3 Certificate of Interested Entities by Fiyyaz Pirani re #1 Complaint (Prongay, Robert) (Filed on 5/3/2022) |
| Filing 2 Proposed Summons. (Prongay, Robert) (Filed on 5/3/2022) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ACANDC-17143329.). Filed byFiyyaz Pirani. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Prongay, Robert) (Filed on 5/3/2022) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
