Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 23
CLEVELAND BAKERS AND TEAMSTERS PENSION FUND v. KORNIT DIGITAL LTD. et al
as 2:2023cv00971
Plaintiff: CLEVELAND BAKERS AND TEAMSTERS PENSION FUND
Defendant: KORNIT DIGITAL LTD., RONEN SAMUEL, ALON ROZNER and others
Petitioner: PHV DANA M. SESHENS
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Hill v. Cleveland Bakers and Teamsters Pension Fund We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv02073
Plaintiff: David Hill
Defendant: Cleveland Bakers and Teamsters Pension Fund
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Cleveland Bakers and Teamsters Pension Fund v. Paul
as 1:2022cv00975
Plaintiff: The Cleveland Bakers and Teamsters Pension Fund, by its Board of Trustees and Cleveland Bakers and Teamsters Pension Fund
Defendant: Daphne Paul and Daphne N. Paul
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Cleveland Bakers and Teamsters Pension Fund v. Netflix, Inc.
as 4:2022cv03164
Plaintiff: Cleveland Bakers and Teamsters Pension Fund
Defendant: Netflix, Inc., Reed Hastings, Theodore Sarandos and others
In re Netflix, Inc. Securities Litigation We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2022cv02672
Plaintiff: Fiyyaz Pirani and Cleveland Bakers and Teamsters Pension Fynd
Defendant: Netflix, Inc., Reed Hastings, Ted Sarandos and others
Consolidated Plaintiff: Cleveland Bakers and Teamsters Pension Fund
Petitioner: Ty Correy
In re: Treasury Securities Auc
as 22-943
Plaintiff: Arkansas Teacher Retirement System, Beaver County Employees' Retirement Fund, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Marc Federighi, individually and on behalf of all those similarly situated and others
Defendant / Appellee: Michael St. John, BNP Paribas Securities Corp., Bank of Nova Scotia, New York Agency and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: City of Pontiac Police and Fire Retirement System, On behalf of itself and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Cleveland Bakers and Teamsters Pension Fund, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Cleveland Bakers and Teamsters Health and Welfare Fund, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and others
Defendant: BMO Capital Markets Corp., CIBC World Markets Corp., Cantor Fitzgerald & Co. and others
Cleveland Bakers and Teamsters Health and Welfare Fund et al v. Davis Bakery, Inc.
as 1:2018cv01218
Plaintiff: Cleveland Bakers and Teamsters Health and Welfare Fund , Cleveland Bakers and Teamsters Pension Fund and Local 19 Cleveland Bakers Charitable, Educational & Recreational Fund
Defendant: Davis Bakery, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Cleveland Bakers and Teamsters Pension Fund et al v. BHR Fresh, LLC
as 1:2018cv00820
Plaintiff: Cleveland Bakers and Teamsters Pension Fund , Cleveland Bakers and Teamsters Health and Welfare Fund and Local 19 Cleveland Bakers' Charitable, Educational and Recreational Fund
Defendant: BHR Fresh, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
The Cleveland Bakers and Teamsters Pension Fund v. General Electric Company et al
as 1:2018cv01404
Plaintiff: The Cleveland Bakers and Teamsters Pension Fund
Defendant: General Electric Company, Jeffrey R. Immelt, Jeffrey S. Bornstein and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Sjunde Ap-Fonden and The Cleveland Bakers and Teamsters Pension Fund, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, v. General Electric Company, et al. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2017cv08457
Defendant: Jeffrey R. Immelt, General Electric Company, John Flannery and others
Plaintiff: Jihad A. Hachem, International Fund Management S.A., Deka International S.A. and others
Petitioner: Richard D. Haynie, New York City Police Pension Fund, New York City Fire Pension Fund and others
Interested Party: Scott+Scott Attorneys at Law LLP
Consolidated Plaintiff: Gopal Mirani
Intervenor Plaintiff: The Cleveland Bakers and Teamsters Pension Fund
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?