Lou v. Accenture United States Group Health Plan et al
Plaintiff: Albert B. Lou
Defendant: Accenture United States Group Health Plan, Accenture LLP and Health Care Service Corporation
Case Number: 4:2022cv03091
Filed: May 26, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Presiding Judge: Haywood S Gilliam
Nature of Suit: Labor: E.R.I.S.A.
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Benefits
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 14, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 21, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 20 STIPULATION Extending Responsive Pleading Filing Deadline filed by Albert B. Lou, Health Care Service Corporation, Accenture United States Group Health Plan and Accenture LLP. (Serebin, Lisa) (Filed on 7/21/2022) Modified on 7/21/2022 (jml, COURT STAFF).
June 29, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 19 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Albert B. Lou Proof of Service of Summons (Attachments: #1 Certificate/Proof of Service, #2 Certificate/Proof of Service)(Serebin, Lisa) (Filed on 6/29/2022)
June 28, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 18 CLERK'S NOTICE SETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE FOR REASSIGNED CIVIL CASE.Notice is hereby given that a Case Management Conference has been set for August 30, 2022, before Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr., at 2:00 p.m. Case Management Statement due by August 23rd. Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. All future filings should reflect the case number as 4:22-cv-03091-HSG. The August 30th proceeding will be held by AT&T Conference Line. The court circulates the following conference number to allow the equivalent of a public hearing by telephone.For conference line information, see: https://apps.cand.uscourts.gov/telhrg/ All counsel, members of the public and press please use the following dial-in information below to access the conference line: Dial In: 888-808-6929Access Code: 6064255The Court may be in session with proceedings in progress when you connect to the conference line. The parties are advised that in the event of an audio problem, counsel should be prepared to attend the hearing via Zoom conference at the Courts direction. Therefore, mute your phone if possible and wait for the Court to address you before speaking on the line. For call clarity, parties shall NOT use speaker phone or earpieces for these calls, and where at all possible, parties shall use landlines. The parties are further advised to ensure that the Court can hear and understand them clearly before speaking at length.PLEASE NOTE: Persons granted access to court proceedings held by telephone or videoconference are reminded that photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings, including screenshots or other visual copying of a hearing, is absolutely prohibited. See General Order 58 at Paragraph III. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.)(ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/28/2022)
June 28, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Judge Haywood S Gilliam, Jr for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore no longer assigned to case Signed by The Clerk on 06/28/2022. (jrs, COURT STAFF)
June 27, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 16 CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because either (1) a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge, or (2) time is of the essence in deciding a pending judicial action for which the necessary consents to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction have not been secured. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED AND SHOULD BE RE-NOTICED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE JUDGE TO WHOM THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (wft, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/27/2022)
June 27, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 15 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Health Care Service Corporation.. (Payton, Gwendolyn) (Filed on 6/27/2022)
June 23, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 14 Order by Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore granting #11 Motion for Pro Hac Vice as to Gwendolyn C. Payton. (wft, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/23/2022)
June 23, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 13 CLERK'S NOTICE Re: Consent or Declination: Defendants shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. Consent/Declination due by 7/7/2022. (wft, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/23/2022)
June 22, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 12 STIPULATION re #1 Complaint, to Extend time to Respond to Complaint filed by Accenture LLP, Accenture United States Group Health Plan and Albert B. Lou. (Thomas, Dominique) (Filed on 6/22/2022) Modified on 6/23/2022 (jml, COURT STAFF).
June 22, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 11 MOTION for leave to appear in Pro Hac Vice ( Filing fee $ 317, receipt number ACANDC-17285911.) filed by Health Care Service Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Cert Good Standing)(Payton, Gwendolyn) (Filed on 6/22/2022)
June 22, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Vincent Ian Parrett (Parrett, Vincent) (Filed on 6/22/2022)
June 2, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Albert B. Lou.. (Serebin, Lisa) (Filed on 6/2/2022)
May 31, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 8/23/2022. Initial Case Management Conference set for 8/30/2022 01:30 PM in Oakland, - To be determined. (jml, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/31/2022)
May 31, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 Summons Issued as to Accenture LLP, Accenture United States Group Health Plan, Health Care Service Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons)(jml, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/31/2022)
May 27, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 6/10/2022. (jrs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/27/2022)
May 26, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 Civil Cover Sheet by Albert B. Lou AMENDED Civil Cover Sheet. (Serebin, Lisa) (Filed on 5/26/2022)
May 26, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Proposed Summons. (Serebin, Lisa) (Filed on 5/26/2022)
May 26, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 Proposed Summons. (Serebin, Lisa) (Filed on 5/26/2022)
May 26, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 Proposed Summons. (Serebin, Lisa) (Filed on 5/26/2022)
May 26, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ACANDC-17213186.). Filed byAlbert B. Lou. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Serebin, Lisa) (Filed on 5/26/2022) Modified on 5/26/2022 (jrs, COURT STAFF). Modified on 5/26/2022 (jrs, COURT STAFF).
May 26, 2022 Opinion or Order Incorrect Civil Cover Sheet used. Please e-file an Amended Civil Cover Sheet only. Event is located at: Other Filings > Other Documents > Civil Cover Sheet. #Electronic fil ing error. Re: #1 Complaint, filed by Albert B. Lou (jrs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/26/2022)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Lou v. Accenture United States Group Health Plan et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Albert B. Lou
Represented By: Lisa Sharon Serebin
Represented By: Joseph Andrew Creitz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Accenture United States Group Health Plan
Represented By: Dominique N. Thomas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Accenture LLP
Represented By: Dominique N. Thomas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Health Care Service Corporation
Represented By: Gwendolyn Cecilia Payton
Represented By: Vincent Ian Parrett
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?