Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Long v. Accenture LLP
as 1:2026cv04083
Plaintiff:
Lashunda Long
Defendant:
Accenture LLP
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Ballentine v. Meta Platforms, Inc. et al
as 4:2026cv05939
Plaintiff:
Marvelle J. Ballentine and Jay
Defendant:
Meta Platforms, Inc., Accenture LLP, Taskus, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Valerio v. Accenture LLP et al
as 3:2026cv03488
Plaintiff:
Storey Valerio
Defendant:
Accenture LLP and Does 1 through 50
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 lr Diversity - Labor
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv03983
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
In re: Marvelle Ballentine
as 26-11229
Petitioner:
In re: MARVELLE J. BALLENTINE
Respondent:
META PLATFORMS, INC., ACCENTURE LLP, TASKUS, INC. and others
Marvelle BallentineIn re: Marvelle Ballentine
as 26-11226
Petitioner:
In re: MARVELLE J. BALLENTINE
Respondent:
META PLATFORMS, INC., ACCENTURE LLP, TASKUS, INC. and others
Erdos-Major v. Accenture LLP, Neuraflash et al
as 3:2026cv01940
Plaintiff:
Alexis Erdos-Major
Defendant:
Does 1 through 100, Neuraflash and Accenture, LLP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1453 Class Action Fairness Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv11479
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Ballentine v. Meta Platforms, Inc. et al
as 5:2026cv00213
Plaintiff:
Marvelle J. Ballentine
Defendant:
Meta Platforms, Inc., Accenture LLP, TaskUs, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel, Assault, Slander
Shirazi et al v. Meta Platforms, Inc. et al
as 3:2026cv02615
Plaintiff:
Brian Y. Shirazi and Nida Samson
Defendant:
Meta Platforms, Inc., WhatsApp LLC, Accenture PLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
