Fayed v. Winslow et al
| James Michael Fayed |
| David Winslow and John Doe #1 |
| 4:2023cv01012 |
| March 6, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| PSLC CHC |
| Jon S Tigar |
| Prisoner: Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 25, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 JUDGMENT. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on April 25, 2023. (mll, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/25/2023)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) |
Filing 11
ORDER OF DISMISSAL. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on April 25, 2023. (mll, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/25/2023)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
|
| Filing 10 Request to Voluntarily Withdraw Complaint #1 Complaint filed by James Michael Fayed. Responses due by 5/19/2023. Replies due by 6/2/2023. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(anj, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/21/2023) |
|
Filing 9
ORDER GRANTING LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Judge Jon S. Tigar granting #4 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; granting #6 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. (mll, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/10/2023)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH LEAVE TO AMEND. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on April 10, 2023. (mll, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/10/2023)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
|
| Filing 7 Prisoner Statement of Account. (anj, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/5/2023) |
| Filing 6 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by James Michael Fayed, CDCR # AK3340.The California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation is directed to submit within 72 hours and in PDF form a certified Prison Trust Account statement for the plaintiff, reflecting the last six months activity, to cdcrfilings@cand.uscourts.gov. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter, #2 Envelope)(cjl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/4/2023) |
| Filing 5 CLERK'S NOTICE re completion of In Forma Pauperis affidavit or payment of filing fee due within 28 days. IFP Form due by 4/24/2023. (jml, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/27/2023)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) |
| Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by James Michael Fayed. (jml, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/22/2023) |
| Filing 3 CLERK'S NOTICE re completion of In Forma Pauperis affidavit or payment of filing fee due within 28 days. IFP Form due by 4/13/2023. (jml, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/6/2023)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by James Michael Fayed. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(jml, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/6/2023) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against John Doe #1, David Winslow. Filed by James Michael Fayed. (jml, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/6/2023) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
