Basra v. Demore
Petitioner: Roop Singh Basra
Respondent: Charles Demore
Case Number: 5:2008cv05146
Filed: November 12, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Office: Prisoner: Vacate Sentence Office
County: Alameda
Presiding Judge: Jeremy Fogel
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Jury Demanded By: 28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 3, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER DISMISSING 1 PETITION AS MOOT. Signed by Judge Jeremy Fogel on 3/3/09. (jflc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/3/2009)
December 10, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Signed by Judge Jeremy Fogel on 12/10/08. (jflc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/10/2008)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Basra v. Demore
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Roop Singh Basra
Represented By: Michael A. Younge
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Charles Demore
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?