Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Basra v. Demore
as 5:2008cv05146
Petitioner:
Roop Singh Basra
Respondent:
Charles Demore
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Grewal v. Gonzalez et al
as 2:2007cv01673
Petitioner:
Pal Singh Grewal
Respondent:
Alberto Gonzalez, Nancy Alcantar and Charles DeMore
Defendant:
United States Immigration and Naturalization Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Deviatyn v. Gonzales et al
as 1:2007cv00993
Petitioner:
Vladimir Deviatyn
Respondent:
Alberto Gonzales, Charles Demore and United States Immigration and Naturalization Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Singh v. Gonzales, et al.
as 1:2007cv00630
Petitioner:
Kultar Singh
Respondent:
Alberto Gonzalez, Charles Demore and United States Immigration and Naturalization Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Singh v. Gonzales, et al.
as 1:2007cv00529
Petitioner:
Nirmal Singh
Respondent:
Alberto Gonzalez, Alberto Gonzalez, Charles Demore and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Jaswal Jorawar Singh v. Albert Gonzales, Et Al.
as 1:2007cv00503
Petitioner:
Jaswal Jorawar Singh
Respondent:
Albert Gonzales, Charles Demore and United States Immigration and Naturalization Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Almousa v. Gonzales, et al.
as 1:2007cv00135
Petitioner:
Khalid Almousa
Respondent:
Alberto Gonzalez, Charles Demore and United States Immigration and Naturalization Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Yakovlev v. Ashcroft et al
as 2:2007cv00118
Petitioner:
Aleksandr Yakovlev
Respondent:
John Ashcroft, Charles DeMore and United States Immigration and Naturalization Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
