Buell et al v. Monterey County, California et al
| Maria Buell, Antonio Alvaro Morales and Guadalupe Joan Perez |
| Monterey County, California and The State of California |
| 5:2010cv01952 |
| May 6, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Jose Office |
| Monterey |
| Jeremy Fogel |
| Voting |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
49
STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE re 48 . Signed by Judge Jeremy Fogel on 9/24/10. (dlm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/27/2010)
|
|
Filing
45
STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE (approving 44 ). The Case Management Conference set for 7/30/2010 is CONTINUED to 9/24/2010 at 10:30 AM in Courtroom 3, 5th Floor, San Jose. Signed by Judge Jeremy Fogel on 7/12/2010. (jflc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/12/2010)
|
|
Filing
37
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE AND DISSOLVING TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER. (jflc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/21/2010)
|
|
Filing
32
ORDER DESIGNATING UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT COMPOSED OF THREE JUDGES PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 2284. Signed by Chief Judge Alex Kozinski on 5/13/2010. (jflc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/19/2010)
|
|
Filing
21
ORDER BY JUDGE JEREMY FOGEL TO SHOW CAUSE RE PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION; 8 TEMPORARY ORDER RESTRAINING SENDING OF ABSENTEE BALLOTS. (jflc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/12/2010)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
