Gonzalez v. Ahmed et al
| Brent Luis Gonzalez |
| Z. Ahmed and Joseph Chudy |
| 5:2010cv05654 |
| December 13, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Jose Office |
| Solano |
| Lucy H. Koh |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
189
ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE; granting 188 . The Clerk shall close the file. Signed by Judge Lucy H. Koh on October 22, 2014. (lhklc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/22/2014) Modified on 10/22/2014 (lhklc1, COURT STAFF).
|
|
Filing
187
ORDER RE SETTLEMENT AND STAY. Signed by Judge Lucy H. Koh on October 21, 2014. (lhklc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/21/2014)
|
|
Filing
183
ORDER RE MEDIATION STATUS UPDATE. Signed by Judge Lucy H. Koh on October 13, 2014. (lhklc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/13/2014)
|
|
Filing
181
ORDER RE MEDIATION. Signed by Judge Lucy H. Koh on October 9, 2014. (lhklc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/9/2014)
|
|
Filing
179
ORDER REGARDING ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION. Signed by Judge Lucy H. Koh on September 9, 2014. (lhklc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/9/2014)
|
|
Filing
166
Order Directing Plaintiff to Respond to Defendants' Ex Parte Application to Modify Scheduling Order. Signed by Judge Lucy H. Koh on 7/23/2014. (lhklc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/23/2014)
|
|
Filing
159
ORDER re 158 Ex Parte MOTION to Continue Expert Discovery and Dispositive Motion Deadlines due to Withdrawal of Defendants' Expert Witness Because of Neurological Conidition filed by Z. Ahmed, Sepulveda, Joseph Chudy. Signed by Judge Lucy H. Koh on 4/30/2014. (lhklc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/30/2014)
|
|
Filing
152
Report of Pro Se Prisoner Early Settlement Proceeding. Case Not Settled. Signed by Judge Nandor J. Vadas on 2/26/14. (glm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/26/2014)
|
|
Filing
127
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A RENEWED MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION re 117 Order on Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by Judge Lucy H. Koh on 8/14/13. (mpb, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/15/2013)
|
|
Filing
117
Order by Hon. Lucy H. Koh granting in part and denying in part 108 Motion for Reconsideration.(lhklc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/24/2013)
|
|
Filing
116
Order by Hon. Lucy H. Koh granting 114 Stipulation.(lhklc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/30/2013)
|
|
Filing
99
Order by Hon. Lucy H. Koh granting 96 Motion for Pro Hac Vice.(lhklc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/14/2013)
|
|
Filing
83
WRIT of habeas corpus ad testificandum issued for presence of Plaintiff at settlement conference. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nandor J. Vadas on 10/17/2012. (njvlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/17/2012)
|
|
Filing
79
ORDER PROVIDING PLAINTIFF NOTICE AND WARNING; SCHEDULING SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING. Although Plaintiff has already filed an opposition, in light of Woods, Plaintiff may file a supplemental opposition within 14 days of the filing date of order. Defendants shall file a supplemental reply to any supplemental opposition within 7 days thereafter. Set/Reset Deadlines as to 57 MOTION for Summary Judgment. Responses due by 7/30/2012. Replies due by 8/6/2012. Signed by Judge Lucy H. Koh on 7/16/2012. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/16/2012)
|
|
Filing
7
ORDER OF SERVICE; DRECTING DEFENDANTS TO FILE DISPOSITIVE MOTION OR NOTICE REGARDING SUCH MOTION. Signed by Judge Lucy H. Koh on 1/31/11. (Attachments: # 1 certificate of mailing)(mpb, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/31/2011)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
