Cases 1 - 10 of 29
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv30073
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Albert Riley v. T. Friederichs, et al
as 19-16289
Defendant / Appellee:
G. KALISHER, Prison Doctor Employed with the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, in her Individual and Official Capacities, T. FRIEDERICHS, Prison Doctor Employed with the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, in his Individual and Official Capacities and Z. AHMED, Prison Doctor Employed with the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, in his Individual and Officals Capacities
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALBERT LEVELL RILEY
Donald Schumaker v. Z. Ahmed
as 19-16041
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DONALD SCHUMAKER
Defendant / Appellee:
Z. AHMED, Primary Case Physician
Riley v. Friederichs et al
as 4:2018cv02283
Plaintiff:
Albert Riley
Defendant:
T. Friederichs, Z. Ahmed and G. Kalisher
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv02226
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Macon v. Elliot, M.D. et al
as 3:2018cv00453
Plaintiff:
Ilijumkuc Macon
Defendant:
C. Elliot, M.D., Cater, Z. Ahmed and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv00136
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Donald L. Schumaker v. Dr. Z. Ahmed
as 4:2017cv03567
Plaintiff:
Donald Schumaker
Defendant:
Z. Ahmed
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Donald L. Schumaker v. Dr. Z. Ahmed
as 2:2017cv03655
Defendant:
Dr. Z. Ahmed
Plaintiff:
Donald Schumaker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brownlee v. Lam et al
as 3:2016cv07048
Plaintiff:
Terrence Brownlee
Defendant:
P. Lam, S. Posson, J. Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
