Jimenez v. Napolitano et al
Leticia Gonzalez Jimenez |
Janet Napolitano, Timothy Aiken, Juan Osuna and Eric Holder, Jr. |
5:2012cv03558 |
July 9, 2012 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
San Jose Office |
Alameda |
Ronald M. Whyte |
General |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 33 ORDER dismissing case with prejudice re 31 Response to Order to Show Cause filed by Leticia Gonzalez Jimenez. Signed by Judge Ronald M Whyte on 7/29/2015. (rmwlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/29/2015) |
Filing 30 ORDER LIFTING STAY, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: DISMISSAL. Petitioner to file a declaration showing what she has done to exhaust her administrative remedies by 7/10/2015. The respondent may file a response by 7/24/2015. Signed by Judge Ronald M. Whyte on 6/25/15. (jgS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/25/2015) |
Filing 25 ORDER staying petition for habeas corpus. Signed by Judge Whyte on 9/30/2013. (rmwlc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/30/2013) |
Filing 24 STIPULATION AND ORDER 16 to Briefing Schedule. Signed by Judge Ronald M. Whyte on 12/21/12. (jg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/21/2012) |
Filing 22 ORDER by Judge Whyte granting 18 20 Motion for Extension of Time to File Reply to Respondent's Opposition to Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. The reply is due on 11/5/2012.(rmwlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/1/2012) |
Filing 15 ORDER by Judge Whyte granting 4 Motion for Stay of Execution of Removal Order.(rmwlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/1/2012) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.