Adobe Systems Incorporated v. Smith

Adobe Systems Incorporated v. Smith

Plaintiff:	Adobe Systems Incorporated
Defendant:	Daniel Smith
Case Number:	5:2014cv00389
Filed:	January 27, 2014
Court:	US District Court for the Northern District of California
Office:	San Jose Office
County:	Santa Clara
Presiding Judge:	Edward J. Davila
Presiding Judge:	Paul Singh Grewal
Nature of Suit:	Copyrights
Cause of Action:	17 U.S.C. § 101
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
August 29, 2014	Filing 32 ORDER GRANTING 31 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal as to Defendant Daniel Smith, an individual and d/b/a DMS Enterprise ONLY filed by Adobe Systems Incorporated. Daniel Smith terminated. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 8/29/2014. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/29/2014)
August 26, 2014	Filing 29 ORDER VACATING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. The court finds that a scheduling conference is unnecessary at this time. Accordingly, the Case Management Conference scheduled for August 29, 2014, is VACATED and Plaintiff shall comply with the followi ng orders: 1. In light of the letters sent to the court by Duy Nguyen (see Docket Item Nos. 22, 23), Plaintiff's anticipated Motion for Entry of Default Judgment must explain, in detail, how Plaintiff came to know that the individual served is r esponsible for the conduct alleged in the Complaint. This explanation should include reference to any discovery which supports the involvement of the particular individual living at the particular address identified. 2. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Ci vil Procedure 4(m), the deadline for completion of service of process on Defendant Daniel Smith is September 2, 2014. Accordingly, on or before that date, Plaintiff shall either (1) serve Smith with the Summons and Complaint, (2) dismiss Smith from t his action pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i), or (3) file an administrative motion which demonstrates good cause for an extension of the service deadline. Plaintiff is notified that the court will dismiss Smith without prejudice if Plaintiff does not comply with this order or fails to show good cause as directed. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 8/26/2014. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/26/2014)

Date Filed

Document Text

August 29, 2014

Filing 32 ORDER GRANTING 31 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal as to Defendant Daniel Smith, an individual and d/b/a DMS Enterprise ONLY filed by Adobe Systems Incorporated. Daniel Smith terminated. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 8/29/2014. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/29/2014)

August 26, 2014

Filing 29 ORDER VACATING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. The court finds that a scheduling conference is unnecessary at this time. Accordingly, the Case Management Conference scheduled for August 29, 2014, is VACATED and Plaintiff shall comply with the followi ng orders: 1. In light of the letters sent to the court by Duy Nguyen (see Docket Item Nos. 22, 23), Plaintiff's anticipated Motion for Entry of Default Judgment must explain, in detail, how Plaintiff came to know that the individual served is r esponsible for the conduct alleged in the Complaint. This explanation should include reference to any discovery which supports the involvement of the particular individual living at the particular address identified. 2. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Ci vil Procedure 4(m), the deadline for completion of service of process on Defendant Daniel Smith is September 2, 2014. Accordingly, on or before that date, Plaintiff shall either (1) serve Smith with the Summons and Complaint, (2) dismiss Smith from t his action pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i), or (3) file an administrative motion which demonstrates good cause for an extension of the service deadline. Plaintiff is notified that the court will dismiss Smith without prejudice if Plaintiff does not comply with this order or fails to show good cause as directed. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 8/26/2014. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/26/2014)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Adobe Systems Incorporated v. Smith
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Daniel Smith
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Adobe Systems Incorporated
Represented By:	J. Andrew Coombs
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?