Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Blaney v. City Neon USA, LLC et al
as 1:2026cv00159
Defendant:
Daniel Smith and City Neon USA, LLC
Plaintiff:
Curtis Blaney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Ichioka v. Smith et al
as 1:2026cv09170
Plaintiff:
William Ichioka
Defendant:
Daniel Smith and Steven Silverman
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case - Other
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv12575
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
SMITH v. FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION
as 4:2026cv00500
Plaintiff:
DANIEL SMITH
Defendant:
FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION, successor by merger to FEDEX GROUND PACKAGE SYSTEM, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 5 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Smith v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2026cv00786
Plaintiff:
Al Daniel Smith
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Enloe v. McMahan et al
as 5:2026cv06160
Plaintiff:
William M Enloe, Jr
Defendant:
Julie McMahan, Darvin Duke, Debbie Roe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SMITH et al v. BOMA NORTH CAROLINA, LLC
as 1:2026cv00787
Plaintiff:
DANIEL SMITH and MAGDALENA SMITH
Defendant:
BOMA NORTH CAROLINA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Fraud
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv00551
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv01855
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Rosenbaum v. Bennett et al
as 1:2026cv01257
Plaintiff:
Aimee Lynn Rosenbaum
Defendant:
K Bennett, E Walters, C Newman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
