Vincent Pastore, et al-v-County of Santa Cruz, et al
Vincent Pastore |
County of Santa Cruz, Robyn Grant, Tony Falcone, Kent Edler and Kevin Fitzpatrick |
5:2015cv01844 |
April 23, 2015 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
San Jose Office |
Santa Cruz |
Howard R. Lloyd |
Other Civil Rights |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 71 ORDER GRANTING 64 DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT WITHOUT LEAVE TO AMEND IN PART AND WITH LEAVE TO AMEND IN PART. Any amended complaint is due by 6/17/2024. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 6/5/2024.(ejdlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/5/2024) |
Filing 69 ORDER NOTIFYING PLAINTIFF OF INTENT TO SUA SPONTE DISMISS NEW TAKINGS CLAIM; PERMITTING RESPONSE. Plaintiff's response, if any, is due by 5/28/2024. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 5/17/2024. (ejdlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/17/2024) |
Filing 61 ORDER GRANTING 55 DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT WITH LEAVE TO AMEND IN PART. Amended Pleadings (if any) due by 4/1/2024. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 3/11/2024.(ejdlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/11/2024) |
Filing 23 ORDER DISMISSING DEFENDANT. All claims against Kent Edler are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m). Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 10/20/2015. (ejdlc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/20/2015) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.