Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv01700
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Mendoza v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority et al
as 1:2021cv00938
Plaintiff:
Teddy Mendoza
Defendant:
Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority, Elizabeth Fitzpatrick and Kevin Fitzpatrick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sifton v. North Adams, City of et al
as 3:2021cv30057
Defendant:
North Adams, Berkshire County, North Adams, City of, Kevin Fitzpatrick and others
Plaintiff:
Richard F Sifton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FITZPATRICK v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv76084
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
KEVIN FITZPATRICK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FREEDOM MORTGAGE CORPORATION v. FITZPATRICK et al
as 1:2020cv05872
Defendant:
KEVIN FITZPATRICK and THOMAS OLSEN
Plaintiff:
FREEDOM MORTGAGE CORPORATION
Achong et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2018cv12144
Plaintiff:
Rona Smith, Richard Nagle, Shquan Mais-Williams and others
Defendant:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A
Fitzpatrick v. First Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company
as 1:2018cv03301
Plaintiff:
Kevin Fitzpatrick
Defendant:
First Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Vargas-Juarbe v. City of Tampa, Florida et al
as 8:2016cv02521
Plaintiff:
Liz M. Vargas-Juarbe
Defendant:
City of Tampa, Florida , Kevin Fitzpatrick , Tampa Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv07044
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Vincent Pastore, et al-v-County of Santa Cruz, et al
as 5:2015cv01844
Plaintiff:
Vincent Pastore
Defendant:
County of Santa Cruz, Robyn Grant, Tony Falcone and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
