Hiramanek v. California Judicial Council et al
| Adil Hiramanek |
| California Judicial Council, Scott Nasson, Daniel Potter, Georgeann M. Wiles, Stacie Antonio, Melissa Crawford, Graciela Miramontes, Conrad Rushing, Tani Cantil-Sakuye, Steven Jahr, Martin Hoshino, California Sixth Appellate District Court, California First Appellate District Court, California Supreme Court and Sidney Thomas |
| 5:2015cv04377 |
| September 24, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Jose Office |
| Santa Clara |
| Howard R. Lloyd |
| Ronald M. Whyte |
| Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 451 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
34
ORDER by Judge Ronald M. Whyte Dismissing Action Without Leave to Amend and Declaring Plaintiff a Vexatious Litigant. The Clerk shall close the file. (rmwlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/31/2016)
|
|
Filing
17
Order by Hon. Ronald M. Whyte denying 15 Request for Reassignment. rmwlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/4/2015).
|
|
Filing
13
RECUSAL ORDER. I, the undersigned Judge of the court, finding myself disqualified from presiding over the above-entitled action, hereby recuse myself from this case and request that it be reassigned pursuant to the applicable provisions of this Districts Assignment Plan. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 10/14/2015. (ejdlc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/14/2015)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
