Maslic et al v. ISM Vuzem d.o.o. et al
| ELVIS KOSCAK, NEDELJKO ZIVANI, Leopold Hubek, Robert Hernaus, LEON HUDOLDETNJAK, ZELJKO PULJKO, DARKO SINCEK, TOMICA PANIC, GOGO REBIC, DAVID STANTE, Stjepan Papes, Sasa Maslic, Ivan Drzaic and MITJA POGOREVC |
| Ivan Vuzem, Robert Vuzem, HRID-MONT d.o.o., Eisenmann Corporation, ISM Vuzem USA, Inc., ISM Vuzem d.o.o., Tesla Inc. and Vuzem USA, Inc., |
| 5:2021cv02556 |
| April 8, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Laurel Beeler |
| Susan van Keulen |
| Lucy H Koh |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 17, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 30
REPLY (re #21 Supplemental MOTION to Remand ) filed bySasa Maslic. (Attachments: #1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(Dresser, William) (Filed on 6/6/2021)
|
|
Filing 29
REPLY (re #20 MOTION for Extension of Time to File [Supplemental] Motion to Remand ) filed bySasa Maslic. (Attachments: #1 Declaration)(Dresser, William) (Filed on 6/2/2021)
|
|
Filing 28
OPPOSITION/RESPONSE (re #22 Joint MOTION to Dismiss Defendants Eisenmann Corporation and Tesla, Inc.s Notice of Motion and Motion To Dismiss Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint ) filed bySasa Maslic. (Attachments: #1 Appendix Request for Judicial Notice, #2 Certificate/Proof of Service)(Dresser, William) (Filed on 6/1/2021)
|
|
Filing 27
OPPOSITION/RESPONSE (re #21 Supplemental MOTION to Remand ) Defendants Eisenmann Corporation and Tesla, Inc.s Opposition to Plaintiffs Supplemental Motion to Remand filed byEisenmann Corporation. (Bernay, Aaron) (Filed on 6/1/2021)
|
|
Filing 26
REPLY (re #21 Supplemental MOTION to Remand , #17 MOTION to Remand ) filed bySasa Maslic. (Attachments: #1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(Dresser, William) (Filed on 5/26/2021)
|
|
Filing 25
OPPOSITION/RESPONSE (re #20 MOTION for Extension of Time to File [Supplemental] Motion to Remand ) filed byEisenmann Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Aaron M. Bernay, #2 Certificate/Proof of Service)(Bernay, Aaron) (Filed on 5/21/2021)
|
|
Filing 24
OPPOSITION/RESPONSE (re #17 MOTION to Remand ) Defendants Eisenmann Corporation and Tesla, Inc.s Opposition to Plaintiffs Motion for Remand filed byEisenmann Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(Bernay, Aaron) (Filed on 5/19/2021)
|
|
Filing 23
Certificate of Interested Entities by Sasa Maslic Local Rule 3-15 Certification (Dresser, William) (Filed on 5/19/2021)
|
|
Filing 22
Joint MOTION to Dismiss Defendants Eisenmann Corporation and Tesla, Inc.s Notice of Motion and Motion To Dismiss Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint filed by Eisenmann Corporation. Motion Hearing set for 9/30/2021 01:30 PM in San Jose, Courtroom 8, 4th Floor before Judge Lucy H. Koh. Responses due by 6/1/2021. Replies due by 6/8/2021. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order, #2 Certificate/Proof of Service)(Bernay, Aaron) (Filed on 5/17/2021)
|
|
Filing 21
Supplemental MOTION to Remand filed by Sasa Maslic. Motion Hearing set for 9/16/2021 01:30 PM in San Jose, Courtroom 8, 4th Floor before Judge Lucy H. Koh. Responses due by 6/1/2021. Replies due by 6/8/2021. (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Certificate/Proof of Service)(Dresser, William) (Filed on 5/17/2021)
|
|
Filing 20
MOTION for Extension of Time to File [Supplemental] Motion to Remand filed by Sasa Maslic. (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Certificate/Proof of Service, #3 Proposed Order)(Dresser, William) (Filed on 5/17/2021)
|
|
Filing 19
SUMMONS Returned Executed by Sasa Maslic. HRID-MONT d.o.o. served on 3/29/2021, answer due 4/19/2021. (Dresser, William) (Filed on 5/17/2021)
|
|
Filing 18
Proof of Service re #17 MOTION to Remand filed by Sasa Maslic. (Related document(s) #17 ) (Dresser, William) (Filed on 5/6/2021) Modified on 5/7/2021 incorrect event selected when posting document (dhmS, COURT STAFF).
|
|
Filing 17
MOTION to Remand filed by Sasa Maslic. Motion Hearing set for 9/16/2021 01:30 PM in San Jose, Courtroom 8, 4th Floor before Judge Lucy H. Koh. Responses due by 5/19/2021. Replies due by 5/26/2021. (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Supplement Request for Judicial Notice, #3 Proposed Order)(Dresser, William) (Filed on 5/5/2021)
|
|
Filing 16
SUMMONS Returned Executed by Sasa Maslic. Ivan Vuzem served on 4/19/2021, answer due 5/10/2021. (Dresser, William) (Filed on 4/22/2021)
|
|
Filing 15
SUMMONS Returned Executed by Sasa Maslic. Robert Vuzem served on 4/19/2021, answer due 5/10/2021. (Dresser, William) (Filed on 4/22/2021)
|
|
Filing 14
SUMMONS Returned Executed by Sasa Maslic. Sasa Maslic served on 4/19/2021, answer due 5/10/2021. (Dresser, William) (Filed on 4/22/2021)
|
|
Filing 13
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Sasa Maslic re #1 Notice of Removal, OF ACTION UNDER 28 U.S.C. 1331, 1441, 1446 and 1453 [FEDERAL QUESTION AND CLASS ACTION FAIRNESS ACT], SUMMONS Returned Executed by Sasa Maslic. ISM Vuzem d.o.o. served on 4/19/2021, answer due 5/10/2021. (Dresser, William) (Filed on 4/22/2021)
|
|
Filing 12
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Eisenmann Corporation (Service Package on Plaintiffs and Defendants) (Holtzman, Alexander) (Filed on 4/20/2021)
|
|
Filing 11
AMENDED CLERK'S NOTICE FOLLOWING CASE REASSIGNMENT TO THE HONORABLE LUCY H. KOH. Per #9 Order Granting Motion to Relate, an Initial Case Management Conference is SET for Wednesday, July 7, 2021 at 2:00 PM before Judge Lucy H. Koh. The Joint Case Management Statement is due seven days prior to the Initial Case Management Conference. See Civil L.R. 16-9 and Civil L.R. 16-10(a). The parties shall familiarize themselves with the Scheduling Notes and Standing Orders for the Hon. Lucy H. Koh: http://cand.uscourts.gov/lhk. This Clerk's Notice supersedes the Clerk's Notice that was filed at ECF No. 10. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (kedS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/15/2021)
|
|
Filing 10
FILED IN ERROR -- SEE ECF NO. 11. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (kedS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/15/2021) Modified on 4/15/2021 (kedS, COURT STAFF).
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Judge Lucy H. Koh for all further proceedings RE 571 Order Relating Cases. Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler no longer assigned to case. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(bwS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/15/2021)
|
|
Filing 9
Order Granting Motion to Relate. Signed by Judge Lucy H. Koh on April 14, 2021. (kedS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/14/2021)
|
|
Filing 7
STIPULATION to Extend Time for Defendants Tesla, Inc. and Eisenmann Corporation to Respond to Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint filed by Eisenmann Corporation. (Bernay, Aaron) (Filed on 4/13/2021)
|
|
Filing 6
Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: This case may fall within the Initial Discovery Protocols for Employment Cases Alleging Adverse Action. See #General Order 71. Parties and Counsel are directed to review General Order 71 to determine whether it applies to this case, and to comply with that General Order if applicable. Case Management Statement due by 7/1/2021 . Initial Case Management Conference set for 7/8/2021 11:00 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom B, 15th Floor. (fabS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/9/2021)
|
|
Filing 5
Order by Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler granting #4 Motion for Pro Hac Vice. Attorney Aaron M. Bernay representing Defendant Eisenmann Corporation. (ejkS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/8/2021)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
|
|
Filing 4
MOTION for leave to appear in Pro Hac Vice of Aaron M. Bernay ( Filing fee $ 317, receipt number 0971-15812965.) filed by Eisenmann Corporation. (Holtzman, Alexander) (Filed on 4/8/2021)
|
|
Filing 3
Certificate of Interested Entities by Eisenmann Corporation identifying Corporate Parent Eisenmann SE, Corporate Parent Eisenmann Bblingen Verwaltung GmbH, Corporate Parent Eisenmann Beteiligungen GmbH for Eisenmann Corporation. (Holtzman, Alexander) (Filed on 4/8/2021)
|
|
Filing 2
Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 4/22/2021. (mbcS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/8/2021)
|
|
Filing 1
NOTICE OF REMOVAL of Action Under 28 U.S.C. 1331, 1441, 1446 and 1453 [Federal Question and Class Action Fairness Act] from Alameda County Superior Court. Their case number is HG20072866. (Filing fee $402 receipt number 0971-15812637). Filed byEisenmann Corporation, Tesla Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Civil Cover Sheet)(Holtzman, Alexander) (Filed on 4/8/2021)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
