Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Novoselac et al v. ISM Vuzem d.o.o. et al
as 5:2021cv08654
Plaintiff:
Stjepan Novoselac, Grega Povh, Davor Hudin and others
Defendant:
ISM Vuzem d.o.o., HRID-MONT d.o.o., Ivan Vuzem and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Maslic et al v. ISM Vuzem d.o.o. et al
as 5:2021cv02556
Plaintiff:
ELVIS KOSCAK, NEDELJKO ZIVANI, Leopold Hubek and others
Defendant:
Ivan Vuzem, Robert Vuzem, HRID-MONT d.o.o. and others
Bushmills Ethanol, Inc. v. Eisenmann Corporation
as 3:2020cv50383
Plaintiff:
BUSHMILLS ETHANOL, INC.
Defendant:
Eisenmann Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
Lesnik v.Eisenmann SE et al
as 5:2016cv01120
Counter Defendant:
Gregor Lesnik
Plaintiff:
United States of America and Stjepan Papes
Defendant:
Eisenmann SE, Eisenmann Alagenbau GmbH & Co. KG, Eisenmann Alagenbau Verwaltung GmbH and others
Counter Claimant:
Eisenmann Corporation
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Wunderlich-Malec Systems, Inc. et al v. Eisenmann Corporation
as 2:2007mc03375
Plaintiff:
Wunderlich-Malec Systems, Inc.
Defendant:
Eisenmann Corporation and Eisenmann Corporation
Movant:
YESAC Alabama Corporation
Cause Of Action: Motion to Quash
Wunderlich-Malec Systems, Inc. et al v. Eisenmann Corporation (MAG+)
as 2:2007mc03374
Plaintiff:
Wunderlich-Malec Systems, Inc.
Defendant:
Eisenmann Corporation and Eisenmann Corporation
Movant:
Hyundai Motor Manufacturing Alabama, LLC and Hyundai Motor Manufacturing Alabama, LLC
Cause Of Action: Motion to Quash
SMITH ENGINEERING V EISENMANN CORP
as 01-1202
Defendant-Appellant:
EISENMANN CORPORATION, EISENMANN CORPORATION and EISENMANN CORPORATION
Plaintiff-Appellee:
SMITH ENGINEERING COMPANY, INC., SMITH ENGINEERING COMPANY, INC. and SMITH ENGINEERING COMPANY, INC.
EISENMANN CORP V REGENERATIVE ENVIR
as 00-1249
Defendant-Appellee:
DURR ENVIRONMENTAL, INC., ELAM COMPANY, INC. and REGENERATIVE ENVIRONMENTAL EQUIPMENT CO., INC.
Plaintiff-Appellant:
EISENMANN CORPORATION
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
