Shams v. Garland et al
Shayan Shams |
Merrick Garland, Christopher Wray, Alejandro Mayorkas, Ur M. Jaddou, Tracy Renaud, John M. Allen, Michael Valverde and USCIS San Jose Field Office |
5:2022cv04846 |
August 24, 2022 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
Virginia K DeMarchi |
Other Immigration Actions |
16 U.S.C. ยง 1361 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 16, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 AFFIDAVIT of Service for Summons and Complaint served on Defendants on 08/31/2022, filed by Shayan Shams. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Certified Mail Receipts, #2 Exhibit Delivery Confirmations)(Sustic, Veronica) (Filed on 9/16/2022) |
Filing 10 Certificate of Interested Entities by Shayan Shams (Sustic, Veronica) (Filed on 9/9/2022) |
Filing 9 ORDER Granting #8 Application for Admission of Attorney Pro Hac Vice for Veronica Sustic, Counsel for Plaintiff. Signed by Judge Virginia K. DeMarchi on 8/29/2022. (amk, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/29/2022) |
Filing 8 MOTION for leave to appear in Pro Hac Vice ( Filing fee $ 317, receipt number ACANDC-17486030.) filed by Shayan Shams. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Good Standing)(Sustic, Veronica) (Filed on 8/29/2022) |
Filing 7 Summons Issued as to John M. Allen, Merrick Garland, Ur M. Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas, Tracy Renaud, USCIS San Jose Field Office, Michael Valverde, Christopher Wray, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (far, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/25/2022) |
Filing 6 Proposed Summons. (Attachments: #1 Defendants' Names and Addresses)(Morrison, Curtis) (Filed on 8/25/2022) |
Filing 5 Immigration Mandamus Case Procedural Order, (far, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/25/2022) |
Filing 4 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Virginia K. DeMarchi. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. (jlg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/25/2022) |
Filing 3 Civil Cover Sheet by Shayan Shams Corrected. (Morrison, Curtis) (Filed on 8/25/2022) |
#Electronic filing error. ONLY ONE SUMMONS TO BE ISSUED PER CASE, USE AN ATTACHMENT TO SUMMONS IF NEEDED TO LIST ADDITIONAL DEFENDANTS INFORMATION [err201]. This filing will not be processed by the clerks office.Please re-file in its entirety. Re: #2 Proposed Summons filed by Shayan Shams (far, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/25/2022) |
Filing 2 Proposed Summons. (Morrison, Curtis) (Filed on 8/24/2022) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Mandamus (Filing fee $402 receipt number ACANDC-17474083). Filed byShayan Shams. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(Morrison, Curtis) (Filed on 8/24/2022) |
#Electronic filing error. Please resubmit Civil Cover Sheet. Use October 2020 form which can be downloaded from https://cand.uscourts.gov/. No judge assignment will be made until t he document is e-filed. Submit your document using Civil Events > Other Filings > Other Documents > Civil Cover Sheet Re: #1 Petition for Writ of Mandamus filed by Shayan Shams (mbc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/24/2022) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.