Schultz et al v. Doe 1 et al
| Dawn Schultz, David Jenks and Danai Mooneyham |
| Doe 1, Doe 2 and Doe 3 |
| 5:2023cv03290 |
| June 30, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Nathanael M Cousins |
| Beth Labson Freeman |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 16, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 23
Request for Judicial Notice re #22 Reply to Opposition/Response, REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT DOE 1'S REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS OR, ALTERNATIVELY, TO STAY PLAINTIFF DAVID JENKS'S CLAIMS filed byDoe 1. (Related document(s) #22 ) (Swaminathan, Priya) (Filed on 8/25/2023)
|
|
Filing 22
REPLY (re #12 MOTION to Dismiss Defendant Doe 1's Notice of Motion and Motion to Dismiss or, Alternatively, to Stay Plaintiff David Jenks's Claimc ) DEFENDANT DOE 1'S REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS OR, ALTERNATIVELY, TO STAY PLAINTIFF DAVID JENKS'S CLAIMS filed byDoe 1. (Attachments: #1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(Swaminathan, Priya) (Filed on 8/25/2023)
|
|
Filing 21
REPLY (re #14 First MOTION to Remand ) filed byDavid Jenks, Danai Mooneyham, Dawn Schultz. (Attachments: #1 Declaration)(Ogden, Mariah) (Filed on 8/17/2023)
|
|
Filing 20
ORDER GRANTING #19 DEFENDANT DOE 1'S MOTION TO ALLOW REPLY BRIEF OF 15 PAGES. Signed by Judge Beth Labson Freeman on 8/15/2023. (blflc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/15/2023)
|
|
Filing 19
ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION to Exceed Page Limitations on Reply Brief re #12 MOTION to Dismiss Defendant Doe 1's Notice of Motion and Motion to Dismiss or, Alternatively, to Stay Plaintiff David Jenks's Claimc, #15 Opposition/Response to Motion, #13 Request for Judicial Notice, DEFENDANT DOE 1'S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO EXCEED PAGE LIMITATIONS filed by Doe 1. Responses due by 8/15/2023. (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Proposed Order)(Pipkin, Elizabeth) (Filed on 8/11/2023)
|
|
Clerk's Notice Resetting Motion Hearings.Motion Hearing as to #14 First MOTION to Remand reset for 11/16/2023 09:00 AM before Judge Beth Labson Freeman and Motion Hearing as to #12 MOTION to Dismiss Defendant Doe 1's Notice of Motion and Motion to Dismiss or, Alternatively, to Stay Plaintiff David Jenks's Claimc reset for 1/18/2024 09:00 AM before Judge Beth Labson Freeman. (tsh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/10/2023)
|
|
Filing 18
OPPOSITION/RESPONSE DEFENDANT DOE 1'S OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO REMAND (re #14 First MOTION to Remand ) filed by Doe 1. (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Declaration, #3 Proposed Order) (Swaminathan, Priya) (Filed on 8/10/2023) Modified on 8/11/2023 (kmg, COURT STAFF).
|
|
Filing 17
ORDER APPROVING #16 JOINT STIPULATION TO 1) EXTEND TIME TO FILE REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS AND 2) MOVE THE HEARING DATES ON THE MOTIONS TO DISMISS AND REMAND. Signed by Judge Beth Labson Freeman on 8/10/2023. (blflc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/10/2023)
|
|
Filing 16
JOINT STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER -JOINT STIPULATION TO: 1) EXTEND TIME TO FILE REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS AND 2) MOVE THE HEARING DATES ON THE MOTIONS TO DISMISS AND REMAND; [PROPOSED] ORDER re #14 First MOTION to Remand , #12 MOTION to Dismiss Defendant Doe 1's Notice of Motion and Motion to Dismiss or, Alternatively, to Stay Plaintiff David Jenks's Claimc filed by Doe 1. (Pipkin, Elizabeth) (Filed on 8/9/2023) Modified on 8/11/2023 (kmg, COURT STAFF).
|
|
Filing 15
OPPOSITION/RESPONSE (re #12 MOTION to Dismiss Defendant Doe 1's Notice of Motion and Motion to Dismiss or, Alternatively, to Stay Plaintiff David Jenks's Claim ) filed by David Jenks, Danai Mooneyham, Dawn Schultz. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of MEO ISO Plaintiff's Opp, #2 Proposed Order PO Denying Motion to Dismiss) (Ogden, Mariah) (Filed on 8/4/2023) Modified on 8/7/2023 (kmg, COURT STAFF).
|
|
Filing 14
First MOTION to Remand filed by David Jenks, Danai Mooneyham, Dawn Schultz. Motion Hearing set for 1/18/2024 09:00 AM in San Jose, Courtroom 3, 5th Floor before Judge Beth Labson Freeman. Responses due by 8/10/2023. Replies due by 8/17/2023. (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Proposed Order)(Ogden, Mariah) (Filed on 7/27/2023)
|
|
Filing 13
Request for Judicial Notice re #12 MOTION to Dismiss Defendant Doe 1's Notice of Motion and Motion to Dismiss or, Alternatively, to Stay Plaintiff David Jenks's Claimc filed byDoe 1. (Related document(s) #12 ) (Swaminathan, Priya) (Filed on 7/21/2023)
|
|
Filing 12
MOTION to Dismiss - Defendant Doe 1's Notice of Motion and Motion to Dismiss or, Alternatively, to Stay Plaintiff David Jenks's Claimc filed by Doe 1. Motion Hearing set for 11/16/2023 09:00 AM in San Jose, Courtroom 3, 5th Floor before Judge Beth Labson Freeman. Responses due by 8/4/2023. Replies due by 8/11/2023. (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Proposed Order)(Swaminathan, Priya) (Filed on 7/21/2023)
|
|
Filing 11
ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand - Answer of Defendant Doe 1 to Complaint for Damages - Jury Trial Demanded byDoe 1. (Swaminathan, Priya) (Filed on 7/21/2023)
|
|
Filing 10
CLERK'S NOTICE RESETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. Case Management Statement due by 11/9/2023. Initial Case Management Conference reset for 11/16/2023 11:00 AM before Judge Beth Labson Freeman. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.)(tsh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/20/2023)
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Judge Beth Labson Freeman for all further proceedings. Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. Magistrate Judge Nathanael M. Cousins remains as referral judge assigned to case. Reassignment Order signed by Clerk on 7/18/2023. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(bw, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/18/2023)
|
|
Filing 8
CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED AND WILL BE RE-NOTICED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE JUDGE TO WHOM THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/17/2023)
|
|
Filing 7
CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Doe 1.. (Pipkin, Elizabeth) (Filed on 7/17/2023)
|
|
Filing 6
Joint Stipulation to Extend the Time to Respond to the Complaint re #1 Notice of Removal filed by Doe 1. (Pipkin, Elizabeth) (Filed on 7/6/2023)
|
|
Filing 5
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Doe 1 of re #2 Certificate of Interested Entities, 3 Case Assigned by Intake, #4 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines, #1 Notice of Removal (Pipkin, Elizabeth) (Filed on 7/5/2023)
|
|
Filing 4
Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 9/27/2023. Initial Case Management Conference set for 10/4/2023 10:00 AM in San Jose, Courtroom 5, 4th Floor. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/3/2023)
|
|
Filing 3
Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Nathanael M. Cousins. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 7/17/2023. (ark, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/3/2023)
|
|
#Electronic filing error. Re: #1 Notice of Removal, filed by Doe 1 Counsel from the state court complaint representing Plaintiffs have been added to the case docket. Per Civil Local Rules 11-1 and 11-3, counsel who have not yet been admitted to practice in the Northern District of California need to make application for admission following either our Admission to Practice (for CA attorneys) or Pro Hac Vice Application (for attorneys outside of CA). Please see our documentation pages for more information: https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/attorneys/admission-to-practice/ and https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/attorneys/pro-hac-vice-appearance/ (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/3/2023)
|
|
Filing 2
Certificate of Interested Entities by Doe 1 (Pipkin, Elizabeth) (Filed on 6/30/2023)
|
|
Filing 1
NOTICE OF REMOVAL Notice of Removal of Action Under 28 U.S.C. 1332, 1441 and 1446 from Santa Clara County Superior Court. Their case number is 22CV408584. (Filing fee $402 receipt number BCANDC-18413424). Filed byDoe 1. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Pipkin, Elizabeth) (Filed on 6/30/2023)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
