Chaker v. Crogan, et al
| 3:2000cv02137 |
| October 23, 2000 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| San Diego Office |
| Roger T. Benitez |
| Barry Ted Moskowitz |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
141
ORDER issuing Writ of Habeas Corpus. The Court hereby ISSUES a Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254. Respondents are ORDERED to release Petitioner forthwith from any and all custodial constraint arising from his February 1999 conviction in San Diego County Superior Court Case No. C186979, and to refrain from contending that the conviction is not null and void. Respondents are DIRECTED to notify any and all agencies which Respondents have notified of the fact of Petitioner's arrest, prosecution and conviction, that the conviction has been declared null and void. The Court retains jurisdiction over this matter for the limited purpose of enforcement of the writ. . Signed by Judge Barry Ted Moskowitz on 9/1/06. (vet, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Chaker v. Crogan, et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
