Roberts, et al v. Cambra, et al

Case Number: 3:2001cv00057
Filed: January 10, 2001
Court: California Southern District Court
Office: San Diego Office
Presiding Judge: M. James Lorenz
Referring Judge: Louisa S Porter
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
November 23, 2009 66 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS as Modified; Denying Petition; and Denying Certificate of Appealability: Petitioners objections are OVERRULED, the Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED AS MODIFIED herein, and the Petition is DENIED. Because Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right, certificate of appealability is DENIED. Signed by Judge M. James Lorenz on 11/23/2009. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(mjj)
February 10, 2009 59 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER Sua Sponte Substituting Respondent: Matthew Cate rep by Attorney General added in place of both Steven Cambra, Jr and Michael S. Evans terminated.. Signed by Magistrate Judge Louisa S Porter on 2/10/2009. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service).(mjj)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Roberts, et al v. Cambra, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?