Bush v. Pliler, et al
| 3:2001cv00142 |
| January 25, 2001 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| Habeas Corpus (General) Office |
| Napoleon A. Jones |
| Nita L. Stormes |
| None |
| Federal Question |
| 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
108
ORDER: (1) Denying Rule 60(b) Motion for Relief from Judgment. and (2) Declining to Issue a Certificate of Appealability (Doc Nos. 103 , 105 , 107 ). Signed by Judge Roger T. Benitez on 6/22/2016. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(knb)
|
|
Filing
94
ORDER granting 92 Motion for Certificate of Appealability. The Court grants Petitioner's request for a certificate of appealability on the issues of whether the prosecutor gave a sufficient race-neutral reason for striking prospective juror Howard, and whether the reasons given by the prosecutor were pretextual. Signed by Judge Napoleon A. Jones, Jr., on 3/20/2009. (cc: US Court of Appeals). (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service). (akr)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Bush v. Pliler, et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
